To take or not to take? What will happen if you do not take the name of the husband – explains esotericism

Not so long ago, this problem did not arise at all: it was solved automatically and did not cause disagreements in the couple. Now, more and more often, women do not take their husband’s surname, remaining on their maiden name. Some of the most popular “official” reasons are voiced:

In fact, if you take a deep look at the history with the surname, the options for its rejection may signal something else. A girl, a wife does not fully accept her husband, and in the relationship there is a kind of reluctance, a disagreement with something. And not taking the name of the future spouse during the marriage is like an accessible way to express your protest, but in an indirect way.

If you ask a girl if she is going to get a tattoo tomorrow and right away, then, most likely, an indignant refusal will follow – this is forever! But the attitude towards marriage is somewhat different. Even if the idea is diffused in society that it is for life, people still insinuate that there is a possibility of divorce. There is such a belief in the subcortex, and it is quite common.

It is a logical reaction of a man – for a woman, a future wife, to take his surname. At least in Russia. Yes, there are other countries, cultures, where there is a different approach to different areas of life, including marriage. But in the Russian mentality, it is absolutely normal and natural for a husband to want to transfer his surname to his chosen one. And consent is read internally as a process of trust on the part of a woman and a willingness to build a long and solid relationship with him.

Unconsciously, a man perceives such a refusal as a rejection of himself. This can in no way affect subsequent family life. Here, it is rather the hidden reasons for the refusal that play a role, the primary source being reluctance, closeness, conflicts hidden under the carpet, discontent or revenge within the family. All this manifests through the surname and carries a destructive force.

Even if a man says he’s not against his wife not taking his last name, that’s not the case. Yet, deep down, he feels rejection and discontent.

This situation means that she energetically continues to be married to him. It’s a fairly common story. Energetically, such a couple remains undivided. Next to the wife, the figure of the former “stands” invisibly and takes the place of a possible future husband. And in the event that she wants to remarry, there may be problems in creating a relationship. If the place of the husband is occupied, then a new man can only come under a free function. And this means that he can only assume such roles: a son (especially if there have been stories of abortions before that), a lover or a father.

A partner comes, but only sex connects him to a woman. Maybe even a series of men, and the girl wonders why they appear in her life only for sex, and not for a serious relationship. It is clear that there can be several reasons, but one of them is obvious – that energetically the woman is still married, since she bears the name of the previous chosen one.

There are cases when she marries a second time and leaves the name of the former. This initially predetermines conflicts and misunderstandings in a couple – after all, despite the fact that they are technically married, in practice they are in distorted roles. A man here is either a son, and then he has problems with responsibility, personal achievement, income. Or he is a father – and then he takes care, instructs, protects, forbids something, totally supports, says where to go and with whom to communicate, suppresses freedom.

It is clear that the surname is a superficial identifier, a means by which one can determine that there are problems in a relationship. But the root is much deeper.

Also read: Couldn’t find a better one? These star men went back to the women they left behind