“I’ve been in movies I hate!” Tom Hanks destroys some of his movies and explains why

What actor or actress hasn’t had a few artistic aspects throughout their career that they could have been fine without? Movies that are sometimes embarrassing, not presumptuous, but you have to boil the pot…

This can also apply to good films that the talent in question hates for various reasons: contractual obligations, disagreements with the production or colleagues responsible for answering… these are not the reasons that are lacking.

In a long interview He is a Yorker Ahead of the release of Asteroid City, two-time Oscar winner Tom Hanks is doing an act of contrition, revealing that he’s also starred in movies he hates.

“Here are the five Rubicon points that everyone who makes movies goes through: The first Rubicon you cross is saying yes to a movie. Your fate is sealed. You get to be in that movie. The second Rubicon is when you actually see the movie you made. Or It works and it’s the movie you wanted to make, or it doesn’t work and it’s not the movie you wanted to make.”

“If it doesn’t make you money, it will ruin your career!”

The Wes Anderson film actor believes “It’s impossible to know” Will the film be good or bad during shooting because “Filming is so slow and specific.”

He adds: “In this process you have to trust people who you hope will always give you their best. You can only have faith and hope – and what is more than faith and hope?”

What about the Third Rubicon? For Hanks, it’s the film’s critical reception. “Someone is going to say, “I hated it.” Other people might say, “I think that’s great.” Somewhere in the middle is what the movie really is.” he explains.

“The fourth Rubicon is the commercial performance of the film. Because if it doesn’t make money, your career will be toast sooner than you want. That’s a fact. That’s the thing. The fifth Rubicon is time.” He continues.

Taking Capra’s film for example (in this case an absolute masterpiece), La Vie est belle has largely become a classic of American cinema over time. And, moreover, by an adoring public. When the film was released in 1946, the reception it received was lukewarm.