Amber Heard’s attorney claims client was “demonized”, claims jurors saw “vitriolic” on social media during Johnny Depp libel trial

after yesterday Verdict in Amber Heard and Johnny Depp’s libel suit Savannah Guthrie sat with the acquaman 2 the star’s attorney, Elaine Bredehoft, to ask her about the case and get her opinion. Bredehoft made it clear that she thought the verdict was a “setback” for women, also saying that Heard had been “demonized” all along. Finally, you stressed that you believe that social networks must have played a very important role in the verdict that was issued.

While Amber Heard scored a small win in the $ 2 million she won in damages in her counterclaim, her ex-husband Johnny Depp received $ 10 million in damages, compensatory interest and another $ 5 million in punitive damages. Considering Virginia law, where the case was solved, this will amount to just over $ 10.3 million in total, as punitive damages are limited to $ 350,000. Either way, it’s still a significant court win for Depp, Bredehoft said This day it only happened because his client was “demonized” in the classroom and online.

It is true that Johnny Depp lost his UK libel suit, a lawsuit filed against The Sun’s parent company after being described as a “wife beater” in an article published by The Sun. The libel case is It was initiated on several grounds and was brought specifically against Amber Heard after she ran an editorial that did not name him but claimed he was abused. The suit has gotten to a point where Depp had lost his role in the fantastic beasts franchising .

For his part, he denounced Depp’s defamation thanks to comments from his attorney Adam Waldman, and asserted his allegedly reduced role in acquaman 2 as proof of defamation. After Heard and Depp shared their sides of the story the trial analyzed whether the statements by both parties were true or false or whether they had been written with malicious intent.

Although this time the verdict was skewed for Depp and his legal team, Elaine Bredehoft said she was considering an appeal and believed Depp’s team had an edge given the general online response to the case. Although jurors were asked not to read or discuss the case outside the courtroom, she says the online presence of the trial would have been impossible to ignore.

Asked Guthrie what Amber Heard would think of a phone call, Elaine Bredehoft also said she “had very good reasons for this”, also calling what happened a “zoo”, apparently mainly for the cameras and others who were present during the trial. . . We will have to wait and see what happens next.

For now, both Johnny Depp and Amber Heard have clarified their views publishing their statements. Depp wasn’t even in court when the verdict was pronounced, instead deciding to stay in the UK and play a show with musician Jeff Beck. His other ex Kate Moss, who had it claimed that the claims made about the actor who abused her were false frequented.