While Britney Spears lived her best married life like her honeymoon on a yacht with Sam Asghari after your fairytale wedding the singer is still embroiled in a number of legal woes during her 13-year guardianship, which finally ended in mid-November 2021. Much of this ongoing legal matter involves Spears’ father Jamie, and both are now settled. Returning to court in late July, a Free Britney attorney asked new people to testify, who she believes were involved in placing Spears in this custody in the first place.
Who wants Free Britney’s attorney to present the Britney Spears v Jamie Spears case?
According to knowledgeable person guardian lawyer Lisa MacCarley (who is involved in the Free Britney movement) filed an amicus brief earlier this week suggesting that Dr. James Edward Spar was found guilty of his alleged diagnosis saying that Spears suffered from dementia and was unable to engage her own attorney in a 2008 medical report, the which would pave the way for Jamie Spears to petition. for protection. According to MacCarley’s writing:
[Britney Spears] he is the last person on earth who should be deposed in this case. The first person on Earth who should be put down is Dr. James Edward Spar. After all, it was Dr. Spar’s mythological statement that brought Britney Jean Spears under the control and custody of James P. Spears, despite her objections in the first place … It’s time we all know the truth about judges and lawyers. who are gone. Britney, with no lifeline, under the control and custody of an abusive male parent who had a long history of abusive and dysfunctional behavior.
MacCarley also called on all the experts who testified and the attorneys who attended the February 4, 2008 closed-door hearing on the pop star’s well-being to be required to testify, as well as the medical report that emerged from these procedures. made public, including everything written.
Why did this new presentation appear in the Britney Spears court case?
This memoir was filed following Jamie Spears ‘request for her daughter to be declared prior to her hearing, due to the young Spears’ social media allegations of alleged abuse while leading her guardianship. Spears spoke since last summer shocking agreement to say that he had to live under guardianship and he didn’t mince words when he detailed how he thinks his family contributed to his situation.
The trial is expected at the end of the month determine whether Spears’ father spied on her or not as you stated. Jamie Spears has publicly denied any wrongdoing on that front, particularly with regard to him planting a bug in Britney Spears’ bedroom or knowing that “such surveillance has taken place”.
What does this file mean for Britney Spears’ case against her father?
Right now, the short answer to this question is that it’s hard to say. MacCarley had to file an amicus brief because he’s not one of the superstar’s attorneys, and those briefs are only filed by people who aren’t directly involved in the case they’re providing information to. This seems to mean that the court can accept or leave MacCarley’s suggestions with little or no consideration, since she is not really involved in the case.
Lisa MacCarley herself told the outlet that there are no “legal” grounds that would prevent Jamie Spears’ legal team from filing Britney Spears, so we’ll just have to wait and see whether or not her statement will have an impact.
Source: Cinemablend
Benjamin Smith is a fashion journalist and author at Gossipify, known for his coverage of the latest fashion trends and industry insights. He writes about clothing, shoes, accessories, and runway shows, providing in-depth analysis and unique perspectives. He’s respected for his ability to spot emerging designers and trends, and for providing practical fashion advice to readers.
