Therefore, it was necessary to wait for him not too far for six years, and to patiently take our pain when he was recruited several times, eventually advanced. But this time this is true: Bong Jun-Ho returned to our rooms with Mickey 17. In Okja, Snowpiercer or even the host line (therefore the parasite is enough from the parasite, despite the classroom battle), the science fiction satire, which is even better speaking of the current society than it was written and found.
For Robert Petinson, the opportunity to add a new prestigious name to its CV and shine with double, Mark Rufalo, Tony Colette, Naomi Aki, Anamaria Varolom or Steven Yun. What do viewers of this highly expected project think?
Out of 123 notes from 5 to 3.6, Mickey 17 starts a rather low film in his director’s filmography, which speaks to the level he could with a parasite (4.5), the memories of the murder (4.3) or the mother (4.1). His new feature film, however, begins in front of Snowpiercer (3.5) and host (3,4).
On the side of Robert Petinson, the film begins with Batman (4,1), from his career summit. But it is close to tennet (3.6) and the devil all the time (3.7) in its recent filmography.
What do viewers think “Mickey 17” do you think?
“The pure movie sf like i love, more sophisticated than grotesque humor, which also reminds me of a cult of good times Brazil (1985) ”Write Mr. Kinnetok (5 to 5). “The same kitsch, dramatic darkness, a film that emphasizes many themes of our humanity or inhumanity. Super entertainment that spins dead time. In short, only happiness and thanks to this good movie for this good movie my filmography in SF.”
“Mickey 17 is a convincing political satire that criticizes populist and eugen capitalism (all similar to existing characters …)”Support Ned123 (5 to 4). “Pattinson is a brilliant antigir that overcomes the world that is falling into the world. Frankly speaking, don’t miss the experience of the movie.” As well as Salok (Same Note): “A very good movie that knows that he does not consider himself seriously and what gives us funny and qualitative fun. As a parasitic, Bong Jun-Ho, nevertheless gives us the film and which not only goes to the end of his ideas, but also a promised history and all that is somewhat successful.”
“Its Acerbic Gaze in the World, an acrobatic blend whose secrets have a secret comic and tragic. Sometimes it seems to be on the edge of the drain, almost a little vanity” “Said in turn Banditant (5 to 4). “Every time he finds a good tone, the right emotion or adventure that keeps stopping, intriguing or moving.
“Mickey 17 is a convincing political satire that criticizes populist and eugen capitalism”
The staging of the Korean director is therefore one of the strengths that often returns. Like Apprehendable (4 to 4): “Bong Joon-Ho does not miss the movie. Here he goes from science fiction drama to comedy with great lightness. The actors are excellent and the film, after a slightly slow start, gets rhythm and transfers important messages. But the other big power point is in front of his camera, with the casting of the movie, Robert Pattinson.
“Robert Pattinson brilliantly portrays Mickey,” spent “, whose body is restored after each death, most of his memories,” Ned123 said again. “The film begins when Mickey 17, the seventeenth repetition, avoids some death and meets his heir, Mickey 18 (mistakenly fortified …).
“Robert Petinson is a lot to do in the master class of acting, recalls the best hours The song of the Kang-HoIn turn, buffet and touch ”Said BanditantWhen Leo B. (5 to 4.5) describes it as “Amazing” And that that “Confirm the talent of his generation” For Shimsouf (5 to 4). “I was reconciled with Pattinson!”Go so that you argue Laura Lavergen (also 5 to 4). “The film is a small SF precious stone full of sarcastic and caricature political references. Mark Rufalo stops and feels on the screen. It was really nice!
“Robert Pattinson confirms the talent of his generations”
A section that has not been found in Mark Rufalo’s colorful performance, which will appeal to the maximum viewer. “Good Bong Joon-Ho … and paradoxically the least amazing movie in my eyes”Regrets in this Naughty doc (At least 5 to 3.5). “The blush of a big shrub that we have generally saw (Okja, Starship TROOPERSSnowpiecer and Moon Keep in mind direct) and have been treated in -depth. Although this Mickey remains in his author’s film in his breast, in satire (sometimes very much in relation to Nos Trump), which is focused on the beaches and blue goes through the excesses of capitalism (overall the main theme of the bong film). ”
“Robert Petinson is excellent and we even have our Vartonomei Anamaria actors and, of course, Mark Rufalo and Tony Colet as some of the super bad people”Write Bart Samson (5 to 3.5). “The only disadvantage is perhaps the” extra “side of the movie that sacrifices the tendency of American blockbusters.” “According to the SnowpiCer line, Bong Jun-Ho continues to criticize political forces with a well-conducted and sometimes offbeat Entertainment.”Said Ed_loisel (The same note) by leaving the same direction. “Some weakness in rhythm and writing, but nothing that really bothered.”
“After the masterpieces of mother and parasite, I was waiting for many Bong Jun-Hos Mickey 17. Unfortunately, this story fails to restore the intensity and the consistency of the narrative, which led to the strength of his previous films.”Thus, it is deplorable Rafael Raco (5 to 3). “If Mickey 17 remains visually careful and benefit from Robert Petinson’s very good performance, which can play two roles in brilliance, it still leaves an unfinished impression.
“Bad Movie with Inexplicable Potential”
“If we appreciate its black humor, even cynicism, the emotion is not distinguished by Mickey 17, which we call a global message, but what seems to be a little converted to virtuous staging of the virtuous Arabs.”Said Cross 1 (5 to 3), some of those who talk about emotion. “This is the same feeling that is felt in front of the two episodes of Dunn: when it is grand and mediocre, it is not touched at all.”
“This satire of megalomaniac capitalism, which by colonization and violent methods, by colonization and violent methods, should have been everything during this period of the reign of Trump-Mousse, but Mickey 17 was very humorous and limited in its final attack, it seems quite inappropriate and harmless.”Resume Damiane (5 to 2.5) before leaning. “In addition, a film that exceeds two hours is experiencing a very frustrated fake rhythm and often a brilliant interpretation, but sometimes bordered by Cabotina.”
But it remains less negative than criticism Chris tetin (1 to 1): “Huge frustration (…) the film is flat, everything is going to be Miles. The concept of clones is never used. We prefer to sell a roofed and grotesque fascist system. With an inexplicable potential that reminds me of bad animation.
Briefly
Robert Petinson is unanimous in his double, Mark Rufalo is not too far away, and Mickey is seduced by the art of Bong Jun-Ho, when it comes to mixing genres for satirical purposes …
And you? What do you think about Mickey 17?
* Notes stopped on Wednesday, March 5, 2025
Source: Allocine
Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.
