The CBF arbitration mediator analyzed the three capital shots of the Alagoas final, played between CRB and ASA, at the King Pelé Stadium, Saturday.
The Alagoas Football Federation (FAF) published on Wednesday (19) the technical opinion of the CBF refereeing defender on the state of the state between Crb and ASA, played last Saturday, at the Rei Pelé stadium. In analysis, every move that generated a discussion has been observed separately and, according to the Confederation, the arbitration worked correctly.
Also on Wednesday, the Board of Directors of ASA issued a note that disputes the document. In the second, the Alvinegro presented the request for challenge of the match at the Alagoas sports court, which was rejected on Wednesday.
– (the opinion) does not answer questions dotted by the Arapiraquense Sports Association (Wing). In the images released by FAF it is possible to see the observer of Var, Ana Paula Dos Santos (CBF), using the phone during the review reviews. Those who also appear in the images with a device are the refereeing analyst George Alves Foza (CBF). In football, it is not allowed to use cell phones in the video referee (VAR) during the game. The cabins are work areas in which professionals should focus exclusively on the analysis of images and decision -making process, without distractions or external interference – says the note of the wing.
CBF’s analysis observed any offer of the game capital and also evaluated the time added by the referee Márcio Dos Santos Oliveira in the second half of the game.
In the move in which the referee validates Miranda’s goal, from Crb, and then back, the opinion notes that there was a failure of the communication generated by the technological variant.
Lance 1 – Validated goal – 2T 18 minutes
There has been no dispute by the teams and this civic defender confirms the decision of the arbitration team.
Lance 2 – Objective annulated – 2T 27min
There was no dispute from the teams and this civic defender accepts the decision of the arbitration team. The failure of communication is a technological variant.
Lance 3 – Confirmed goal – 2T 55min
Through the analysis of the images made available, that the ball hits the attacker’s chest before entering the defender’s goal, without violation of the rule 12.
Situation 4 – Add time
In an analysis of the arrests during the second half of the game, it was concluded that the additions of 17 minutes (14 + 3) granted by the central referee were generally compatible with waste of time, since they were 6 minutes in the goals celebrations, 10 minutes in the athlete treatments, 9 minutes while controlling the VAR, as well as the waste of replacements of the ball. Furthermore, the rules of the positive game according to which “the referee will make his decisions according to his criterion and according to the rules of the game and the” spirit of the game. “Decisions are based on the referee’s opinion, which has the discretionary power to take adequate measures according to the rules of the game.”
In addition, the rules book also affirms “the fourth referee will indicate the minimum increase in addition to the referee at the end of the last minute of all time of play and that the increase time can be expanded by the referee but not reduced”. It is the opinion.
Source: Terra
Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.
