Although it was presented before January 8, the original forgiveness proposal received seven appeals that expand the scope to those involved in the attacks
Brasilia – O formal discussion By Jair Bolsonaro (PL) and his allies on the amnesty of January 8 they focused on the trapped militants. But the bill articulated to the Chamber of Representatives that proposes to forgive the crimes concerning that episode have gaps Advance the former president directly.
As shown by Estadão Amnesty ScoreExclusive survey published on Sunday, at least one third (171) of the 513 parliamentarians of the House of Representatives support the proposal – a sufficient number to guarantee the presentation of the proposal to emerge from the bill in the plenary of the Chamber.
Despite the original project, proposed by the then Federal deputy Major Vitor Hugo (PL-Go), was filed on November 24, 2022, more than a month before attacks on the three powers in Brazilia, the proposal received seven appeals to embrace consecutive events.
The text of Vitor Hugo Provides amnesty Protesters, truck drivers, businessmen and all those who participated in events “everywhere in the national territory” – Bolsonaro was in Florida at the time of scammers – but one of the paragraphs expands forgiveness to those who also participated in the “financing, organization or support of any kind”.
“The amnesty to which we refer in the Caput includes political crimes or with these and electoral connections. The crimes of any type related to political crimes or political motivation are considered related to the document, which have received criticism from the Minister of the Secretariat of the institutional reports of the Government of Lula, Gleisi Hoffmann (PT), Saturday 22.
“In a clear language: in addition to the attacks of January 8, the fields on the barracks, the blocks of the roads, the bomb at Brazilia airport, would have been forgiven as” connected crimes “the decrees of the coup, the murder plan of Lula, ALCKmin and Alexandre de Moraes, the conspiracy with the military leaders, all the crimes committed by Bolsharo and they do not buy the electoral crimes I am, it has never been for the “women of the Bible”.
When the proposal was presented, the supporters of Bolsonaro emigrated from the highways before the barracks and episodes like January 8 were not yet on the horizon. It was not until December 12 that violence has recruited. That day, the date of the graduation of the then elected president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT), the radical pockets tried to break into the Federal Police building, set fire to cars and buses and blocked roads in Brazilia.
Already that day, the deputy José Medeiros (PL-MT) presented a project to Amnesty “all those who, from 1 June 2022 until the date of entry into force of this law, have expressed, through individual or collective acts, or have financed or participated in these events and protests, relating to the 2022 elections and relevant topics.”
The violation of covering Bolsonaro’s situation today reported by the office of the Prosecutor General (PGR) to the Federal Supreme Court (Stf) for attempted coup d’etat and condemned twice to the inextriction of electoral justice, it has been expanded to other invoices.
The proposal of Marcelo Crivella (Republicans-Rj) and his Chamber bench grants the amnesty to participants in events with political or electoral motivation, or who have supported them with contributions, donations, logistical support or supply of services and publications on social networks. He underlines that the amnesty includes crimes with political or electoral motivation.
The justification of the critical text The “abundant prisons” on January 8, mentioned as an episode that generated “the greatest confusion” between the events and defined as “exceptional”. Crivella refers to her proposal as “audience, cooling of spirits and congratulating the opposites through sovereign forgiveness”.
Adilson Barroso (PL-SP) It was the highest to propose a project that aimed at Bolsonaro Forgiono was presented on the same day on which the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) sentenced the former president to inadmissibility for attacks on democracy on June 30, 2023 politicians.
In the same way, the Vice project Cabo Gilberto Silva (PL-PB) proposes to the accused and condemned amnesty for non-democratic crimes on January 8th. “It is noteworthy that we are not proposing a large amnesty, but only for these specific crimes, given the impossibility of objectively identifying the intention to commit them. The accusations and convictions for qualified damage crimes, the deterioration of the listed inheritance and the criminal association, has perhaps verified due to demonstrations”, says the text.
The text of Ramagem delegate (PL-RJ) and five co-religionists aim to separate the vandals from the supporters, financiers and organizers of January 8. Proposes to change the criminal code to include the term “violence against the person” in the article that deals with “trying, with the use of violence or serious threat, to abolish the state of democratic law”. The goal is to exclude interpretations that frame as “attack on the state of democratic law what is actually damage to public inheritance, depictions and similar”.
The project of Hélio Lopes (PL-RJ), another of Bolsonaro’s shock troop at home, was the only one attached to that of Vitor Hugo who aims to detain a lower purchasing power rather than encourage the “big fish” of the episode. The text provides for the delivery of the benefit in cash (alternative sentence to arrest, which consists in paying a sum of money to the victim) those arrested pockets that are recorded in the single register or show that they are not able to pay the payment “without prejudice to their own or family support”.
Finally, even if the revocation of punishments and crimes attributed to all involved “in events of January 8, 2023”, the proposal of Polone Marcos (PL-MS) limits forgiveness to the accusations and convictions of the crimes of “Army criminal association, violent abolition of the state of democratic law, attempted suddenly and incitement to crime”.
It provides that the amnesty does not prevent the continuity of the investigations on any crime committed during the law, that is, there would be a vandalism against public activities, for example. Cites “disproportionate punishments” and “heavy penalties” because of a “error in the typing of the conduct”, since, according to the author, there was an excessive generalization of the conduct, typed as an attempt to hit less serious actions.
Despite the gaps, Bolsonaro and the allies have hit the discussion in the trapped militants and sometimes dodged to respond if the forgiveness of the former president is for forgiveness. In February, during a trip to the Federal Senate, he was asked if he would have had enough votes to approve his amnesty. He replied that his case could be resolved with a revision of the clean record law, not a bill to forgive his crimes.
“My case is not the amnesty. My case is to change the clean record law. Let that a little more mature. People understand that the clean record law is used to pursue the right, that’s all here,” said Bolsonaro at that moment. Contrary to what Bolsonaro says, PT and PL had almost the same number of candidates prohibited by the clean record in 2024.
As shown by Estadão Amnesty Scoreat least 43 deputies are in favor of the information or reduction of the penalties of those involved in the documents, but are against this advantage to the former president.
Follow “Estadão” on social networks
Source: Terra
Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.
