Is materialist a good movie? Viewers make their opinion on romantic comedy with Dakota Johnson and Pedro Pascal

In July 2023, those who knew the name of Celine’s song in France. If you did not follow the Berlin festival news, where his first feature film was presented, or the opportunity to find it, until the filmmaker was still known: when the past life came out in the United States, which was very enthusiastic, when he went through our rooms on December 13.

Less than two years later, the director and screenwriter returned to the issues, a new study of the complexity of romantic reports that sees an ambitious match (Dakota Johnson), who is torn between the one who is a perfect man (Chris Evans) and his very understandable man. Romantic comedy, which is not really so much that it plays with its codes to be modern, but what did the viewers think?

With 5 to 3.09 received from 106 notes, materialists start very far from the 4.1 past life, from the previous film by Celine Sonde. In Dakota Johnson’s filmography, it raises the need for speed (3,14) and daddio (3.08). The strange way of life (3,11) and solid gold talent (3.05) on the side of Pedro Pascal. And between pain merchants (3.29) and a gray man (3.02) in Chris Evans career.

What do viewers think about “materialists”?

It is declared in the title, and this is evident, which is primarily about the qualities of internet users: the study of the materialistic vision of the symptomatic love of our time. “A movie that kills the truth about love”Said so Have (5 to 5). “A beautiful metaphor that is better to better want to miss what we already have. The suggestion to summarize this:” Good person, bad time. “He will talk to today and yesterday with all the couples and date. He is simple, realistic, sweet, moving.”

“Celine Song offends love with scalpel … golden”Addition Direct-Actu.Fr (Same note). “And if you love it, it was just a good placement? Along with the materialists, Cinnie’s song (already noticed past life) changes your tone, but no target: modern romanticism. Peaceful souls, hello intangible assets. Blow up.

“Before becoming romance, materialists, first of all, uncompromising criticism of romantic clashes“, Summary Cat’s eyes (5 to 4.5). “High -level marriage agencies or dating sites, the same struggle: earning money on the sentimental calamity of someone else or irreparable love. A vicious circle that invites users to think of others, and consider themselves as numbers, figures, goods than just as people who love love.”

“Before becoming romance, materialists, above all, uncompromising criticism of romantic clashes.”

Sister Livia Basque Erikson (5 to 4) adds to the topic: “A very beautiful film that discusses the definition of love and ideal that we have in our capitalist societies. Materialist love in which we are looking for another criteria, even though we are convinced that we will achieve the form of happiness.” When Lil Sprite (The same) writes, emphasizes another degree of film that “Materialists are a very interesting satirical romantic comedy, inspired by staging that strengthens prestigious actors.”

Yes, and not surprisingly: the trio of stars that gathered on the poster, the argument of selling the main feature film seems to be one of its strengths. Home Proud R. (Especially from 5) (from 4 to) (from 4) (“This is especially dialogue for perfection. Texts that represent the heavy and emotional core of the amazing, beautiful and rare Finas. Nothing spoils. The trio of actors who dance, is impeccable, as well as music, second master stroke!”).

“The film could go much further on the topic of marriage as a financial transaction.”

If the actors are mostly attracted, writing is more discussed. Arsen (5 to 3) thus puts the set “A very predictable, always romantic film formula, seen and corrected, but good actors.” “The whole rhythm is deprived. The love triangle is not fed any suspicious, because it is clearly what we find from the beginning and the clichés are in every game: women are all venous and materialists and only rich men are looking for.Sorry for his side David -37 (5 to 2).

“In fact, the film is more interesting when traveling with its main character, a very materialist, as the title offers, which then learns that love is not ordered that it is not just a matter of check boxes and a purely practical partner with whom he creates a perfect couple on paper.”Can we still read Shawn777That gives it the same note. “It’s a shame, as the film can go farer than the topic of marriage as a financial deal, a legacy consolidation and no more romantic love action, especially when consumers are at its peak.”Said Piv (1 to 5), one of the most negative internet users on feature films. “But the film remains not too surface, all the clutches go there and the end is more than predictable and without any touch.”

Briefly

Actors are fascinating to absolutely every viewer: both who are sensitive to the writing, staging, and words of Celine’s song, and those who regret the lack of originality and the story that does not go to the end of his ideas. In short, a movie that you should see to get your own opinion.

And you? What do you think about materialists?

* Notes stopped on Thursday, July 3, 2025