The referee reports “threats and accusations” in the summary of Corinzi and RB Bragantino

The members of the Timão Commission have considerably contested the penalty provided for the Gross Mass, even in the first half of the clash

Defeated by RB Bragantino 2-1, at the Neo Chemistry Arena, the Corinthians did not hide the dissatisfaction with the arbitration of the game. Especially in relation to the penalty that originated the first goal of the visiting team. The penalty of the penalty took place in the first half, after the dispute between the defender Cacá and the striker Vinicinho at the entrance of the area.

Referee Bruno Arleu de Araújo reported the infringement after the revision in Var, which considered that, even with light contact, the game was reckless. In addition, the defender would have taken the risk of reaching his opponent with his leg at speed.

However, the decision generated a revolt from the Corinthian technical staff. In fact, in the summary of the game, the referee reported that five club officials approached the arbitration team aggressively in the tunnel that gives access to the locker room.

Among those mentioned are Fabinho Soldado (Executive Football), Mauro Ricardo Da Silva (Technical Observator), Inverson Pimentel (physical coach), Marcelo Carpes (goalkeeper) and José Carlos de Freitas Junior (administrative coordinator). According to Arleu, Mauro Ricardo had to be contained by the police after an exalted complaint: “It wasn’t a penalty! It is always you! Come here to hurt us!”.

At the end of the game, the pressure continued. After all, Marcelo Carpes and José Carlos de Freitas Jr. have made against the offer, stating: “Nobody will talk about the penalty? Are you very bad!” Finally, the summary also recorded the invasion of a child in the eastern sector of the stadium, promptly contained by safety.

Audio VAR in the controversial penalty in Corinzi and RB Bragantino

The Brazilian football confederation (CBF) has released the audio of communication between the field referee and the VAR. In the dialogue, the managers of the arbitration confirm that the touch existed and that, from the dynamics of the game, the action of Cacá was interpreted as reckless, justifying the marking of the penalty.

With the defeat, the Corinthians are still in a delicate situation in the table and now awaits the consequences of post-match relationships, which can involve administrative or disciplinary punishments.

Follow our content on social networks: Bluesky, Threads, Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

Source: Terra

Rose

Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.