The group made up of five former referees analyzed the controversial offer in Paulista’s duel and concluded that the arbitration agreed to mark the infringement
The consultative committee of international arbitration specialists, created by CBF this year to analyze controversial games, issued an opinion on Tuesday (15) which, ratifying the correction of the sign of penalty marked by the referee Bruno Arleu de Araújo in favor of the Red Bull Bragantino in the duel against the Corinthians, valid for the 13th round of the Brazilian championship.
The offer occurred 26 minutes in the first half, when Vinicinho entered the area and, when he tried to dominate headlong, he was intercepted by the defender Cacá. The Corinthian defender lengthened his leg and then collected it, raising questions about contact. Following the VAR recommendation, the referee examined the offer on the monitor and confirmed the penalty, which generated a strong dispute by the Alvinegra team.
In fact, the opinion was signed by the weight names of the world arbitration: Italian Nicola Rizzoli, Argentine Pitana and Brazilian Sandro Meira Ricci. The refereeing director of the CBF Rodrigo Cintra and the member of the Commission, Fabrício Vilarinho, also participated in the analysis.
“The technical opinion of the International Committee is that there has been a penalty in the cited offer. Corinthian player cannot reach the ball in the air and, with his leg. Ostructures the player’s passage from the Red Bull Bragantino inside the criminal area. The contact of the defender’s legs with the body of the attacker’s body is also on the shoulder and is demonstrated by the movement of the Defnder’s legs”.
Corinthians who scold with arbitration
Incidentally, the penalty converted by Eduardo Sasha opened the markings in Bragantino, who won the 2-1 clash in the chemistry arena. The result expanded the crisis in Corinthians, who currently fights to get away from the relegation area.
In addition, on Monday (14), the San Paolo club sent a letter to the CBF, with a copy to the Paulist Football Federation, to protest against the execution of Bruno Arleu de Araújo, asking for explanations on the marking. However, even with dissatisfaction, the technical opinion supports arbitration and strengthens the legality of the decision within the VAR protocol.
Follow our content on social networks: Bluesky, Threads, Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.
Source: Terra
Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.
