With a note of 1.6/5, we are clearly found in one of the worst science fiction films of the year, according to Internet users

A few days ago, Amazon added to Katimin to the World Catalog War. Beyond this American film, it hides the new adaptation of WORLS of World, the famous HG Wells novel. The work is brilliantly adapted by Steven Spielberg in 2011. If we believe in the American press and viewers, this personal universal production of cinema is far from the same level.

The original concept that does not take

After Worls of Worlds, Will Redford is a cyber security expert within the framework of internal security performed by a former rapper Ice Cube. The latter spends its days in the pursuit of potential threats. But attack by an unknown person is wondering if the government does not hide something from it … just like the rest of the world.

The science fiction film offers an unprecedented concept, screens, extraordinary invasion, screens. The process that is already visible in the cinema, especially in search – the lost and the lost range: a disturbing disappearance called “screening”. If the idea is interesting and sincerely original, the director Rich Lee seems to have difficulty using it properly.

In the United States, the war of the universe is stretched by criticism, at the stage that one of the worst films of the year is being discussed, which is 0% of its average Rotten tomatoes (Coming of notes). On the distribution, the feature film, which is also worn by Eva Longoria, is not better, with only 1.6 collection.

What do French viewers think?

Despite its bad press in the United States, Worls of Worlds still managed to attract French bonus subscribers, as the science fiction film currently the most shown on the platform. Despite some viral comments that call it “turnip”, viewers generally share frustration, and emphasize the originality of the film:

“After Spielberg, frustration is excellent. I am with these films made from pseudo-reality. Websites, smartphones, social networks, etc. (Piche92)

“Look closely, because sincerely, if you like the Spielberg version, you will destroy your hair in front of this very bad movie.” (Taverner)

“Trying to convey a very important message, the film is lost with more eccentric inconsistencies than any other. Nothing is trustworthy, from beginning to end.” (Jm lagast)

“The war of war universes. The new adaptation of this cult novel is digital in the way. This interpretive computer screens are boring. Frustration.” (Deflock)

“In short, I’m not going to stop: I didn’t like this movie. The concept could be beautiful. (Tragmuab)

“Ah,*World War (2025)*… or how to transform a two-hour-long epic. It was necessary to dare: re-reading the novel. (Shadow)

World War to watch a prime video.