“One of the best films of the year” or “worst frustration”: What do Evanuis viewers think?

“One of the best films of the year” or “worst frustration”: What do Evanuis viewers think?

After the critical and public success of Barbaros, which came out with us directly to Disney+, director Zac Crager returned to Evanuis Terror (Weapon en vo).

Barbarian was such a success that the auctions gave up on the acquisition of Evanuis’s rights before the story was announced. The feature film was finally purchased by New Line Cinema (a subsidiary of Warnermedia Group) for $ 38 million. Respectively Hollywood reporterImportant offers were made “obviously” before the project was detected.

Julia Garner (recent Marvel movie The Fantastic 4) and Josh Brolin’s Silver Serfer, the feature film is banned in theaters under 12.

When all children of the same class except one, the mysterious disappeared the same night, at the same time, the whole city is trying to find out who – or what – under the origin of this unexplained phenomenon.

What do the first viewers of the feature film think?

With 239 notes and 53 critics, Evanuis has an average viewer’s note from 5.8 to 5 stars. This is more than barbaric noted that the viewer was 3.3 stars.

Viewers appreciate the performance of Zack Crager, narration structure, mysterious atmosphere, as well as actors, in particular Josh Brolin.

The best movie of the year?

Alice025 of the Allociné Club is a dithyrambic: “What a shame! This film is full of various aspects and drives us to the topical of these children in this story that disappeared in nature. The scenario treatment is truly qualitative, which shares the view of different characters, whose link sometimes we do not understand the main story, but whose puzzle fits as you.

Part of the Mystery is good to the end, the tension is increasing, we have nerves to the test, and some jumps were frightened to me. The last part is very bold, as it will create as much as you laugh, and then bring it under tension, the mix of genres is controlled in such a short time without falling into the clutches. Impeccable molding, engagement investigation, terrible moments mixed with black humor, I think we are one of the best films this year. “

Butcher also Lotbrock: “Zac Crager delivers the experience of hallucinatory cinema through these tents and the intellectual terrible thriller that drives us from the first to the last picture.

Evanuis has undoubtedly proven that this is a timely classic of the terrible movie theater of the 2020s, which confirms the dazzling uphill of the huge filmmaker Zak Crager. “

Mikcado comments on his 4 stars: “In the middle of the night, the mysterious disappearance of children’s class stimulates the American city. What happened? Magnolia’s film gradually gives the puzzle parts of the puzzle, through the panop of its imperfect characters, from the jungle to the alcoholic teacher through a traitorous and violent police officer, with the surprising mixing of genres (we laugh as well as one bunch). Not indicated in the directory (this is shining, Blair’s magician …) and a good dosage between the scare, reflection and action. “

For naughty docConger transforms the test into this mix between Altman and Stephen King (Sprinkled with Gone Gone). Surprisingly less terrible than barbaric, the weapon still conquers us regularly in a very tense sequence and your consistent variations, depending on the characters’ point of view. The film is also good, even in its curious fun final. The concern is due to this climax, of course successful, but in 10 minutes it was sent after this exemplary was created. It deserved more magnitude and a real epilogue. Anyway, it is a success (and Conger argues that he will be the perfect author of Resident Evil). “

Guan Cooper adds: “What a movie! The gentle start, the acceleration of the story that drives us in a dubious and wonderful final. Clever construction and very good interpretations of this film will make it one of the best of this year.”

Or the frustration of the year?

In the negative points, some viewers find the scenario inconsistent and pace very slowly.

Tom C writes: “Good ideas and great achievement. Very good actors, it’s always nice to see Josh Brolin. Good moments of anxiety, but besides that, the story is half way, poorly exploited, not trustworthy and it goes far. “

AAA is the same opinion: “After the first hour of secrets and colds, the film is simple and brings a resolution of lazy and uninteresting screenwriters. “

22Sur20 – Alex gives it a note of 2 stars and comments: “The film puts eternity for eternity. In the fault of the structure of the screenwriters, each of them focused on a different point of view.

For Matiu Valentine it is “A long film, sometimes with a flat rhythm and a sense of empty scenario. The worst frustration of 2025. ”

Briefly

In short, Evanuis is seduced by most viewers, his inventor, his mysterious atmosphere and his account, which gradually reveals intrigue. The mix of genres – between the horror, the thriller, the drama, and the black humor – appreciates its mastery, as well as the performances of the actors. The film is perceived by many as an intense, Imeretian and bold cinematic experience.

However, some viewers remain hungry. They criticize the film with a slow rhythm, sometimes inconsistent or very explosive scenario and resolution that is considered to be dead or unsatisfactory. The structure in the heads, though initially not unanimous, some believe that it is confused or unnecessary. Despite these reservations, évanouis turns out to be a singular and important sentence for most viewers for the genre cinema, thereby following Zac Crager as a director.

The film must be found in theaters.

Source: Allocine

You may also like