Miramax Sues Quentin Tarantino Over Plan to Launch Immutable Tokens pulp Fiction Open a new front in the battle of the NFTs. The studio argues that this is a zero-sum game: only one side should be allowed to enjoy the new frontier of TV and film exploration. But the case may require a more nuanced outcome, in the form of a ruling that allows both parties to sell NFTs based on certain copyrights.
The lawsuit questions whether Tarantino wrote and owns the copyright to the script. pulp FictionYou have the right to publish parts of the work selling NFTs.
The case can go to the interpretation of the contract. Tarantino says releasing NFTs is within his protected rights. Under the agreement with Miramax, Tarantino has the right to “print publications (including unlimited screenplays, production of books, comics and novels, as well as audio and electronic formats, as well as interactive media”).
“The allegations in the Miramax lawsuit show that the main content related to the NFT auction consists of ‘electronic copies of the first Pulp Fiction manuscript,'” wrote Brian Friedman, a spokesman for Tarantino. Application for conviction on June 21. There is no doubt that it is an electronic publication of a screenplay: the distribution of one or more electronic copies.
Meanwhile, Miramax argues that its rights are broader and incorporate technology that had not yet been developed in 1996, when the deal closed. The company, which owns the film’s copyright, files a contract and focuses on anything it claims to have “all rights.” . . Now or later known. . . Known in all media now or in the future.”
Seeking an early victory in the case, Tarantino asks the court to focus on copyright law. He claims he is not infringing any of Miramax’s copyrights because the NFTs are using the script. pulp Fiction And not the movie itself.
“The film’s screenplay is the original copyrighted work that precedes the film, and the exclusive on-screen copyright, including elements such as dialogue, characters, story, and scene description, belongs to the author of the screenplay,” Friedman wrote. “The film created from the script is his work.”
Miramax’s copyright on the film only applies to new elements not derived directly from the script, such as the film’s presentation, character performances, and any additional music or sound effects, Tarantino said. However, the NFTs that plan to release it are scripts produced. The main content associated with the NFTs to be auctioned consists of electronic copies of the first handwritten scripts. pulp Fictionsays Tarantino.
A possible outcome of the case could be an order authorizing both parties to sell NFTs based on their copyright.
“Both parties have their rights protected and both parties have the opportunity to use NFTs to enforce those rights, in the case of the Miramax film and Tarantino’s screenplay,” said Jeremy Goldman, partner at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz. Law of Fun and Technology.
But that result includes an order that the NFT is not covered by the rights protected by either party. Miramax relies on the language of the contract, which is “all rights reserved. . . Now or later known. . . Known in all media now or in the future”, but NFT is not traditionally considered a media.
“NFT is not a form of distribution or media, it’s a Miramax misunderstanding,” Goldman said. “They see NFTs as a means of dissemination, part of how people view content. It’s not that. It’s just a property record.”
Miramax on Tarantino’s plans may come from the director, who initially includes elements of the film in his NFTs. For example, earlier works showed footage of Samuel L. Jackson and John Travolta allegedly infringing on Miramax’s copyright on the film. They have since been replaced by images of Tarantino.
Source: Hollywood Reporter