Netflix struck with a lawsuit for inventing Anna, highlighting the problem with so many real crime shows going on

Netflix struck with a lawsuit for inventing Anna, highlighting the problem with so many real crime shows going on

The past few years have seen an explosion of real crime media, from big screen movies to high profile podcasts and an endless stream of documentaries broadcast and episodic adaptations. netflix hit invent ana represents a partial shift in focus from the sinister murder and kidnapping subgenre to large-scale scams, financial scams, and other forms of gruesome behavior, and the streaming service offered similar rate described as The Tinder scammer , The most hated man in AmericaYes worst roommate ever, among others. But there are consequences to doubling down on so many projects based on real events, as Netflix was hit with a lawsuit over how one of the invent anaThe characters were portrayed.

The lawsuit was filed on Monday, August 29, and former Vanity Fair photo editor Rachel Williams is the plaintiff seeking damages. Netflix appears to be the only defendant targeted by the lawsuit, with executive producer Shonda Rimes and her production company Shondaland not being named, nor the actress who played Williams in invent ana, Scandal veterinarian Katie Lowes.

In the lawsuit, Rachel Williams’ lawyers accuse the show of defaming their client using her real name while portraying her in a very negative way to fit the drama’s theme. Here’s how things got written in the papers, through Term :

This action will demonstrate that Netflix has made a deliberate decision for dramatic purposes to show Williams doing or saying things on the show that portray her as greedy, snobbish, disloyal, dishonest, cowardly, manipulative, and opportunistic. . . . Defamatory statements are defamatory because they tend to expose them to public contempt, ridicule, hatred or disgrace, or induce a bad opinion of them, and are in themselves defamatory because their importance emerges from the face of the series without resorting to any other. source.

The sticking point here is the main factor as to why the recent increase in real crime programming could be problematic, like Netflix and Shondaland pay over $ 320,000 central subject Anna “Delvey” Sorkin only got her rights for life, unlike anyone else involved or not. But while Rachel Williams didn’t see a financial windfall from Netflix, she landed her contract with HBO for her 2019 book of hers. My friend Anna: the true story of a false heiress, in a deal that reportedly cost about $ 340,000, excluding taxes. There was therefore an additional motivation to pursue legal action against the streaming service, even beyond the impact of the alleged defamation and invasion of privacy.

Williams’ lawsuit also exposes this reasoning in a straightforward but still questioning way that manages to send praise to the high-end cable company Warner Bros. Discovery.

The reason we had to sue this is because Netflix used Rachel’s real name and bio details and made her look like a horrible person, which she isn’t. The devastating damage to her reputation could have been avoided if only Netflix had used a different fictitious name and details. Why didn’t they do it for her, when they did it for so many other characters on the show? The reason for this may have been that she chose to play for the other team, which is HBO.

It is imagined that creative teams in television and film would like to bring as much authentic information as possible to projects based on specific real-world events. But that would likely require bankruptcy for a studio group, and a big spendthrift like Netflix is ​​no exception. As such, a steady influx of new true crime projects obviously increases the potential for more and more cases like this to emerge, unless the creators choose to romance all the other characters beyond the tracks, legally bound.

This isn’t even the first lawsuit of its kind against Netflix, with The queen’s bet it also inspires the fact that the service is still blocked. And if these lawsuits go the way plaintiffs want, it potentially opens the door to more cases that emerge based on other projects from past years.

Currently, Rachel Williams and her legal team are seeking unspecified damages as they seek a jury trial and injunction that would force Netflix to edit Williams’ portrait of Katie Lowes out of print. invent ana in all. This, however, would be completely unprecedented and it is more likely that an agreement will be reached before a trial takes place, but surely strange things have happened.

invent ana captured two important Emmy nominations earlier this year for Best Limited Series and Julia Garner for Best Actress in a Limited Series, so it doesn’t seem like everyone’s awareness of the project will dissipate anytime soon. (Especially if you win). Anna Sorkin said she distanced herself to distance herself of the reputation as a scammer that led her to international infamy, so she could watch whatever HBO eventually posts to make sure it represents her fairly.

anyone who has a netflix subscription currently it can stream everything invent anawith a lot other great shows to watch on the streaming service ,

Source: Cinemablend

You may also like