Ana Hickmann’s husband cites prints and audio to ask for an end to the precautionary measure

Ana Hickmann’s husband cites prints and audio to ask for an end to the precautionary measure


Alexandre Correa’s defense claims that the messages sent by the presenter to arrange a meeting between the entrepreneur and his son justify the request

html[data-range=”xlarge”] figure image img.img-68cf9ad219aedc44e923eca14f492ac3857v1g4x { width: 774px; height: 581px; }HTML[data-range=”large”] figure image img.img-68cf9ad219aedc44e923eca14f492ac3857v1g4x { width: 548px; height: 411px; }HTML[data-range=”small”] figure image img.img-68cf9ad219aedc44e923eca14f492ac3857v1g4x, html[data-range=”medium”] figure image img.img-68cf9ad219aedc44e923eca14f492ac3857v1g4x { width: 564px; height: 423px; }HTML[data-range=”small”] .article__image-embed, html[data-range=”medium”] .article__image-embed {width: 564px; margin: 0 automatic 30px; }




Alessandro Correaex-husband of Ana Hickmannhas carried out, through its lawyers, a request for revocation of precautionary measures “because the reasons that gave rise to them do not exist”, last Friday, 8. Estadao I tried to contact Ana’s counselor regarding the matter this Saturday, the 9th, but received no response. Last November 11, the presenter filed a complaint with the police for domestic violence and also accuses her partner in relation to the management of the couple’s company.

The process document, to which the Estadao accessed, it was filed at the Itu Domestic Violence Court, signed by Diva lawyers Carla Bueno Nogueira and Enio Martis Murad. It also calls for the lifting of “protection measures that limit the applicant’s right to maintain personal contact and the right, without any supervision or oversight, with their child, as well as to frequent their companies.”

There is also reproduction of prints (screenshots) with message exchanges between Alexandre Correa and Ana Hickmann in relation to their son, called “Alezinho” by the couple. The first message shown by Correa was apparently sent by Ana, which reads: “Hello, regarding your visit with Alezinho. The date will be communicated this week.”

Among the nine printouts attached to the request, there is not the entire conversation, but there are excerpts of the day’s negotiations for Correa to visit his son, and Ana’s request that this happen in the presence of the boy’s grandparents, as well as comments about vacating an apartment. Correa’s defense argues that “if the beneficiary of the protection measures herself does not feel forced to maintain contact with the applicant, it is necessary to agree that it is not necessary to maintain judicial restrictions.”

Excerpts from some audio sent by Ana Hickmann, even without complete contextualization. In one, Ana says: “I only started talking because you told Alezinho you were going to pick him up at your friend’s house. You can’t pick him up.”

Ana Hickmann: everything about the presenter's case
Ana Hickmann: everything about the presenter’s case

“Please respect the decisions. Since you have already publicly renounced shared custody, which you have not renounced, Maria da Penha protects me and protects our son from this, ok? The visit is assisted, at home of his parents, a safe place for him, okay? You won’t go out alone with our son,” he comments in another.

In another audio, Ana Hickmann asks Correa: “Please don’t use my audios, don’t make our conversations about our son public.”

In the request for revocation of the precautionary measure, Correa’s lawyers justify: “The Prosecutor’s Office, citing the suspicion that the alleged victim has suffered violence against the assets, insists on imposing a restriction on the applicant not to visit the headquarters of the company of which he holds the capital 50%”.

“This Court must be informed that, on 12/04/2023, the alleged victim, via WhatsApp messages, contacted the appellant to discuss the relationship between the couple’s son, and there was no disrespect on the part of the appellant in against judicial restrictions.

The appellant explains that he was video chatting with his son via mobile phone and had agreed that he would pick up the minor on Wednesday, the alleged victim, who was nearby and listened to the conversation, immediately afterwards sent him messages preventing the parent from meeting on the day on the agreed day…

Now, if the beneficiary of the precautionary measures herself does not feel forced to maintain contact with the applicant, it is necessary to agree that there is no need to maintain the judicial restrictions, which, evidently, does not prevent this court from re-decreeing them if there are reasons that justify it.”

Correa’s lawyers also highlight a passage of the law that says: “The judge can revoke pre-trial detention if, during the trial, he finds that there is no reason to continue it, as well as order it again if there are reasons to justify it.” “.

OR Estadao sought contact with the rapporteur’s advisor, but did not receive a response until the publication of this report.

Early on Saturday the 9th, Ana Hickmann posted a content ad on Instagram with a video in which she said that “in this new phase of my life, all I want most is to be free to pursue my dreams and goals.”

“Something I thought I already had, but I actually only started to have it, feel it and really experience it recently. When we talk about freedom, it’s not the freedom to do whatever you want. It’s much more than that. Freedom to think, to to choose, to act, to smile, to choose what I believe is best for me”, he says.

Last Thursday, 7th, the Estadao revealed that Ana hired a criminal expert who had previously worked for Lula’s defense in Lava Jato to investigate Correa’s administrative management in the companies where the former couple are partners. The two had debts of at least R$5 million and this would be one of the reasons for the dispute that led to the attack. Find out more about the case here.

Source: Terra

You may also like