After confirmation of the signature, Ana Hickmann pronounces: “It will be contested”

HTML[data-range=”xlarge”] IMAG.IMG-E16F4C7D84FB0237B18870CEBE99A732Z3XISKUI {Width: 774px; Height: 435px; } html[data-range=”large”] IMAG.IMG-E16F4C7D84FB0237B18870CEBE99A732Z3XISKUI {Width: 548px; Height: 308px; } html[data-range=”small”] Image figure img.img-e16f4c7d84fb0237b18870cebe99a732z3xiskui, html[data-range=”medium”] IMAG.IMG-E16F4C7D84FB0237B18870CEBE99A732Z3XISKUI {Width: 564px; Height: 317px; } html[data-range=”small”] . Article___MAGE-MOB, HTML[data-range=”medium”] . Margin: 0 Auto 30px; }

This Wednesday (19), the presenter Ana Hickmann He commented on the relationship of experts who confirmed the authenticity of his signature in documents relating to a negotiation with Banco Daycoval. The analysis was carried out by a court appointed by the Court, after Hickmann say that your ex -husband, Alexandre CorreaHe would have falsified his signature in financial contracts. The controversy arises in the midst of a judicial battle involving millionaire accusations.

The presenter’s consultant declared, with the column of Fábia Oliveira do metrópoles, That the relationship of experts has not yet been approved by the judge and can be contested in court. “The relationship of experts mentioned in the matter has not yet been approved by the judge and can be revised by the courts, as it has different dependencies in its conclusion. The material will be contested “Ana Hickmann’s team said.

The presenter questioned the validity of a debit of over $ 730,000 from Banco Daycoval, claiming that he does not recognize the signatures attributed to her in bank documents. In October 2024, the Column of Fábia Oliveira had already revealed that a judicial expert had been appointed to examine the authenticity of the signatures. Before then, Hickmann He had already hired an expert to analyze documents and strengthen his counterfeit accusations.

However, the bank rejected the report produced by the private expert assumed by the presenter, claiming that the document was not valid as a judicial test. According to the financial institution, only an impartial experience, conducted by a professional designated by the Court, could demonstrate the authenticity of the signatures.

The judicial expert, after analyzing the signatures present in the bank documents and comparing them with other records of the presenter, concluded that the manuscripts correspond to the calligraphy of Ana Hickmann. “The tests strongly support the hypothesis that the manuscripts were produced by the same person who provided the standards, Mrs. Ana Lucia Hickmann Correa”The expert in the document said. The relationship of experts, which has over 100 pages of technical analysis, can have a significant impact on the cause and the financial dispute between the presenter and his ex -husband.

Source: Terra

Amanda

I am Amanda Gans, a motivated and ambitious professional in the news writing industry. With over five years of experience in this field, I have developed an eye for detail and an ability to craft stories that captivate readers. I currently write for Gossipify, where I specialize in beauty & celebrities news. My passion lies with exploring the world of beauty through writing, interviewing experts and developing articles that are both informative and entertaining.