Marlene Mattos sucks the winner of reality for a debt of $ 500,000

Former agent of Xuxa Meneghel, Marlene Mattos He entered the court accusing Kaio Perroni, winner of reality The great conquest 2from the record, to him due to $ 500,000, referring to an agreement that would have been stipulated before the influencer entry into the program. The information was initially published by the editorialist Gabriel Bees, from Uol.

According to the business woman, the boy should pay 50% of the amount earned for the entrepreneur for the services provided in the merchandising shares. That is, he should have moved to his half of the $ 1 million award from reality and earnings obtained with advertising. The transfer of values, however, did not happen.

In court, Mattos presented the contract signed with perone weeks before reality. In it, the business woman would commit himself to allowing the entrance to the program in the program, providing social networks and press office services and was responsible for the payment of his personal accounts during childbirth.

• Receive the main news directly on WhatsApp! Sign up for the Earth channel

The trial began in September 2024, about two months after the end of reality. In the action to which the editorialist had access, the business woman asked the urgent court to block the second episode of the prize.

Initially, however, judge Ana Carolina Miranda de Oliveira contested the lack of exact values ​​that Marlene would like to receive. In turn, the defense of the business woman stressed that it would not be possible to know, as it has no access to the extracts of the sample of reality.

In a demonstration of discontent, the judge Sérgio Ricardo Duarte wrote that he had found the value of the prize through rapid internet research.

“In the present case, with a rapid search on Google, it is clear that the value of the prize obtained from the defendant in the reality show in which he participated and has been the winner is $ 1,000,000.00. However, if the value of the prize is known to the authors, the value expected by them is also of their knowledge and cannot assign the value indicated in the initial,” he said.

Subsequently, Marlene’s defense set the amount of $ 500,000 and the Court supported the action.

THE Earth He did not find the contact of the defenses of Marlene Mattos and Kaio Perroni until the publication of this article. The space is still open to demonstrations.

Source: Terra