Indirect? The attitude of Murilo Huff Polemiza and apps Dona Ruth after the Leo guard

The judicial struggle between Murilo Hufff AND Dona Ruth It continues to give something to talk about on social networks. By the way, now the Country singer had a controversial attitude after the court’s decision on the temporary custody of his son Leo. Understand!

This because Murile has enjoyed a publication that analyzes the situation that he and the mother of Marília Mendonça Encounter. The publication states that it would allow the shared custody in 2021, after the death of the country, for love. However, he decided to act and chase the unilateral guard after noticing some “warnings”. In addition, the publication also criticizes the objects of the eternal queen of the suffering that the family has put up for auction.

It is interesting to note that the team of Huff He issued an official declaration after the sentence provided by the Court. “In this scenario, although the process is secretly provided, it is important to note that the decision taken clearly on the basis of the facts and the contarious evidence of the case and the fixing of the right of coexistence was determined by the judge who supported the circumstances of the trial, of course, of course, the best for the well -being of Leo”, “ says the text.

See this photo on Instagram

A publication shared by Subcelebrities (@subcelebrities)

Dona Ruth’s negligence?

But is it possible to Murilo Huff lose the provisional protection? For the family lawyer Dr. Silvana Campos, it is very unlikely to happen. “Legally speaking, I don’t think the loss this provisional protection. To revoke the judge, the evidence must be many curtains. If the judge convinced himself that there was an immediate locomotion of Leo to be with his father, then I think he will not change until the end of the trial.”He explained.

He also says that the only possibility of Dona Ruth Bringing back the guard is if the figure of Huff was not present: “The guard would remain with his grandmother only if the father did not want or died. As it does not happen, the definitive custody must be declared to the father.”

Source: Terra