Gal Costa’s widow is condemned for not having paid the bills of the house where she lived with the singer; understand

HTML[data-range=”xlarge”] IMG.IMG-FDF40F6D6380D13D51A2CCF0D228ACFA83PUL7F7 {Width: 774px figure; Height: 435px; } html[data-range=”large”] IMG.IMG-FDF40F6D6380D13D51A2CCF0D228ACFA83PUL7F7 {Width: 548px figure; Height: 308px; } html[data-range=”small”] IMG.IMG-FDF40F6D6380D13D51A2CCF0D228ACFA83Pul7F7, HTML[data-range=”medium”] IMG.IMG-FDF40F6D6380D13D51A2CCF0D228ACFA83PUL7F7 {Width: 564px figure; Height: 317px; } html[data-range=”small”] . Article___MAGE-MOB, HTML[data-range=”medium”] . Margin: 0 Auto 30px; }

The Court of Justice of San Paolo (TJ-SP) condemned the widow of Gal Costa, Wilma Teodoro Petrillo, to compensate for the material and moral damage for the buyer of the house where he lived together with the singer. This is because Wilma remained in the property even after the sale. He has not yet paid the bills of energy and gas and has made it difficult to transfer the property to the new owner.

• Receive the main news directly on WhatsApp! Sign up for the Earth channel

Wilma was ordered to pay the buyer of the house, Daniela Cutait, R $ 2.5 thousand of tangible goods – representing losses with gas and energy accounts – and more R $ 10,000 as moral damage. Therefore for a total of R $ 12 thousand.

In parallel, the ten -day period was set to transfer the ownership of the accounts, with a daily fine of $ 300.

As obtained by EarthThe decision in First application It was released on 30 and published on Tuesday the 1st on Tuesday. Appeal in the decision.

What happened?

According to the decision, Daniela, the new owner of the property in the capital, has filed the cause to have difficulty transferring consumers – energy and gas – in his name. Wilma contested, claiming that she is not responsible for the contractual obligations of the deceased Gal Costa.

The judge rejected the topic, stating that “Although the defendant does not formally appear in the purchase and sale contract between the actor and Gal Costa, it is not controversial that he remained resided in the property after the artist’s death, enjoying public services related to good“.

Therefore, it has been understood that in “condition of exclusive user and direct beneficiary of the utilities, it is responsible for the obligations deriving from the enjoyment of the property, including the maintenance of the ownership of the consumer accounts”.

That was then decided Wilma should reimburse the amounts of the accounts against the owner. In addition, considering that the situation generated an improper public exhibition, as well as the crimes of the widow against the new owner, the amount of compensation for moral damage has been set.

THE Earth Try to contact the defenses of the people involved. The space is still open and will be updated in case of demonstrations.

Source: Terra

Amanda

I am Amanda Gans, a motivated and ambitious professional in the news writing industry. With over five years of experience in this field, I have developed an eye for detail and an ability to craft stories that captivate readers. I currently write for Gossipify, where I specialize in beauty & celebrities news. My passion lies with exploring the world of beauty through writing, interviewing experts and developing articles that are both informative and entertaining.