Daddy Yankee files two million dollar lawsuit against his wife: details

Dad Yankee interjected two requests against Mireddys González, for allegedly making $100 million in unauthorized transfers from company accounts. Ayeicha González, his wife’s sister, would also participate.

Why Did Daddy Yankee Sue His Wife?

According to legal documents accessed by the “La Comay” program, the reggaeton player accuses the Mireddys and Ayeicha González “of mismanagement and embezzlement at El Cartel Records. It requires full control of the company, access to the documents held and the exclusion of the accused, after irregularities are discovered and unauthorized transfer of $80 millionaffecting his career and image”.

In the second lawsuit, the interpreter “Gasolina” claims that ” mismanagement and negligent actions at Los Cangris, Inc. Daddy Yankee accuses the defendants of mismanaging the company’s finances, executing Trade up to $20 million without authorizationand deny access to key corporate information.”

In both complaints, the retired artist “is seeking full control of the company and measures to prevent irreparable damage to his image and artistic career,” it explains.

They would have sold Daddy Yankee’s music catalog

According to MoluscoTV, the lawsuit states that the transaction “allegedly took place disguised as allegedly paying dividendsin the name of her and the plaintiff”.

According to the report, “Mireddys had authority over the companies to which Daddy Yankee had trademarked his name and copyright, to facilitate legal and contractual procedures. Mireddys sister, Ayeicha, was part of company”.

It is also alleged that the wife of ‘Big Boss’ ‘hired a third party to represent the cartel, in sale of plaintiff’s music catalog. The transaction was formalized by the sale of these rights to a price, which turned out to be unreasonable, disproportionate and far below the real value“.

“Although the plaintiff has signed the agreement, under the advice of this third party and the defendants, the plaintiff You were not given a copy of all the contract documentsand to this day he is unaware of the true scope of the transaction, nor does he have detailed knowledge of what was or was not sold, nor the restrictions he may have on the use of his musical creations,” the complaint explains.