He lost! Deolane Bezerra move the action against Leo Dias and ends up paying a journalist

He lost! Deolane Bezerra move the action against Leo Dias and ends up paying a journalist


Deolane Bezerra moves R $ 30,000 for moral damage, but justice has believed that the journalist told only real facts




The Justice of San Paolo rejected the request for compensation for the influencer Deolane Bezerra against the journalist Leo Dias. The decision, which denied the amount of R $ 30 thousand requested by the influencer for moral damages, also ordered to pay $ 3,300 in the legal fees.

The Court of Justice of San Paolo understood that there was no irregularity in the relationships of Leo Dias. In the decision, it was stated that the journalist has just narrated the facts based on official records. The understanding of the speaker also concluded that the reported facts had a social interest in involving a public personality.

The action of Deolane It was a response to an article sent in September 2024 on the FOFOCALIZA DI SBT program. In content, Leo Dias He commented on the arrest of the influencer and reported his name to a criminal organization and the money laundering crime.

Deolane said that the relationship would exceed the limits of freedom of the press and violated his image. The influencer also required that the journalist was forbidden to mention it in the press.

The decision was signed by the judge Vito Guglielmiof the sixth chamber of private law. He stressed that freedom of the press is protected when it is exercised within legal limits. The journalist was represented by the lawyer Halyne Marques.

Deolane Bezerra Anthete -calendar on the lighting of the judicial trial: “War”

Deolane Bezerra, The influencer and the digital lawyer used his social networks to share a vent with the followers on Monday (28). The famous appeared visibly shaken by commenting on the decision of the judge Andréa Calado da Cruz, who transferred the trial in which Deolane and his mother, Solange Bezerra, are investigated by alleged involvement in a money recycling system relating to gambling, for the Federal Court. Continue reading here!

Source: Terra

You may also like