The shepherd Renalida de Lima Souza Paiva Silva suits Hytalo Santos after being prevented from entering the church itself
Since September 2024, 3rd Corte mixed with CabedeloIn Paraíba, he accompanies a process that involves the shepherd Renalide of Lima Souza Paiva Silva and the digital influencer Hytalo José Santos Silvaknown as Hytalo Santos. The conflict revolves around a commercial warehouse located in Delfim Moreira Street, in the Jardim América district, in Cabedelo, worth $ 530 thousand. The property, recorded in the name of Renalist With registration n. 15,956, would have been temporarily assigned to influencer. According to the shepherd, the delivery of the keys has occurred “In order to contribute to the realization of a social work” AND “In order to build a temple for the Church that the author is a shepherd”being the reform considered by her “Another gift from the defendant to the actor and the religious community”.
The understanding between the parties, however, broke weeks after the start of the renewal. In the case file, Renalist accusation Hytalo adopt “arbitrary conduct”How to prevent him from entering the property, install cameras and guide the workers to block their entry. He also says that his things have been delivered “In a plastic bag” to a family member. Incorrectly in an agreement attempt, he notified the influencer of leaving the space until September 24, 2024. According to the shepherd, he replied by changing the locks and putting the currents, keeping the work “Rapid rhythm” And without allowing you to know what was done on the spot.
In action, Renalist He asks for the immediate recovery of the property, the loss of any improvements made by the defendant and the exemption of any compensation. Already Hytalo Santos He submitted the defense with a reconventional application, claiming that there was a payment for the shed and that the intention was to donate it to the CNPJ of the Church. According to him, the record in the name of the shepherd took place “By mistake or intent”That’s why it requires the cancellation of the transaction and the reversal of the registration. The process includes documents as an act, purchase and sale contract, photos, videos and messages exchanged between the parties, as well as relations on “Voluntary donation”.
In February 2025, Renalist He reported that he had recovered the possession of the shed. Even so, the case has not been resolved, as it awaits a judicial decision on the form of extinction. The shepherd requires a low process due to the loss of objects, while the influencer requires the approval of an agreement. So far there is no definitive phrase and the controversy is still marked by accusations of violation of trust and divergences on the final destination of the property.
Source: Terra
Ashley Fitzgerald is a journalist and author at Gossipify, known for her coverage of famous people and their lives. She writes about a wide range of topics, including celebrities, influencers, social media stars, and public figures. Her articles are known for their in-depth analysis and unique perspective. She is respected for her ability to keep readers up to date with the latest news and trends of the famous people.
