The corn syrup that Trump wants to take from Coca-Cola Bad?

The corn syrup that Trump wants to take from Coca-Cola Bad?


Nutritionist says that sugar cane sugar is seen as less industrialized




The president of the United States Donald Trump said that Coca-Cola agreed to replace the corn syrup with sugar sugar to sweeten the soda sold in the United States. In addition, the health secretary of Trump, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., showed concern about the risks of the current health ingredient. But after all, is corn syrup bad?

“The HFCs (corn syrup) are not healthy in large quantities, but this is also true for sugar cane sugar. Mutual change does not solve the main problem: excessive consumption of sugary drinks”, says Vanessa Giglio, clinical nutritionist and nourishment

According to the expert, in terms of metabolic health, there is no clear evidence that sugar cane sugar is substantially better than corn syrup.

Corn syrup is a caloric sweetener: “Solcina, but has calories, as well as ordinary sugar (≈ 4 kcal per gram). Therefore, it is not a food sweetener or” zero sugar “”, he explains.

What are the advantages of the change in corn syrup for sugar cane sugar (sucrose)?

1. More “natural” image

• Sugar cane sugar is seen as less industrialized.

• This improves the perception of consumers, although metabolically both are very similar.

2. Possible reduction in fructose

• corn syrup has more free fructose than ordinary sugar (which is 50% of fructose + 50% of “glued” glucose).

• Free excess fructose is more associated with fatty liver, metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance.

“Theoretically, the way the body metabolizes sugar cane sugar can be less aggressive for the liver than the HFCs, although this difference is thin and controversial”, explains the nutritionist.

3. Less additives in the process

• Corn syrup crosses a complex enzymatic process to produce.

• Sugar cane sugar, although refined, is a more direct process (grinding, evaporation.

Source: Terra

You may also like