Amber Heard’s 2018 editorial now comes with a long editor’s note following Johnny Depp’s verdict

Amber Heard’s 2018 editorial now comes with a long editor’s note following Johnny Depp’s verdict

Johnny Depp scored a big win in his highly publicized e lawsuit for defamation with his ex-wife Amber Heard. At the heart of the six-week trial was a 2018 editorial written by the actress and published in the Washington Post, and a the jury found Heard guilty of three counts of defamation – awarding Depp $ 15 million in the process – the media site added a lengthy editor’s note to the original editorial, providing the necessary context for future readers.

For six weeks, a The jury was tasked with deciding whether Amber Heard’s article , titled “I Spoke Against Sexual Violence and Confronted the Wrath of Our Culture. That has to change, “she hinted or insinuated about her ex-husband and that his statements were false or written with malicious intent. In condemning Heard, the Washington Post added a lengthy addendum to the online version of the article, citing the passages. deemed defamatory:

Editor’s Note, June 2, 2022: In 2019, Johnny Depp sued Amber Heard for defamation resulting from this 2018 editorial. On June 1, 2022, following a trial at Fairfax County Circuit Court, Virginia, a jury held Heard responsible for three counts for the following statements, which Depp said were false and defamatory: (1) “I have spoken out against sexual assault: and I have faced the wrath of our culture. This needs to change. (2) “Then, two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic violence and I felt the full force of our culture’s anger at women expressing themselves.” (3) “I had the rare advantage of seeing, in real time, how institutions protect men accused of abuse.” The jury found separately that Depp, through his attorney Adam Waldman, defamed Heard for one of three counts in his cross-suit.

During the trial, which was closely followed by the fans who were able to do so watch the debates on tv , public opinion was strongly in favor of Johnny Depp. Although Depp wasn’t specifically mentioned in the editorial, Depp’s attorneys insisted their client was involved as an abuser, and a jury unanimously agreed. He was awarded $ 10 million in compensatory damages and an additional $ 5 million in punitive damages. Considering Virginia law, where the case was settled, this amounts to just over $ 10.3 million in total, with punitive damages limited to $ 350,000.

Amber Heard scored a small win in the $ 2 million in damages she was awarded, but the fight isn’t over for him. acquaman 2 actress, as her lawyer Elaine Bredehoft says, plans to appeal. Bredehoft said your client has been “demonized” and there were a number of things that it shouldn’t have happened during the process. He also claimed that the general online response gave Johnny Depp an unfair advantage, despite the jury’s instructions not to read or discuss the case outside the courtroom.

The Pirates of the Caribbean actor Meanwhile, posted a response to the verdict , saying that “the jury has given me back my life”. Johnny Depp said six years ago that “the media brought very serious and false criminal charges against me” and he said he was “truly honored” by the court’s decision. The actor said he felt at peace for being able to reveal the truth.

Johnny Depp earlier he lost the role of Gellert Grindelwald in the fantastic beasts franchise when it lost a similar defamation cast in the UK. now with a Petition for the removal of Amber Heard acquaman 2 gaining momentum, it will be interesting to see if and how the recent jury findings affect the cast. upcoming movie .

Source: Cinemablend

You may also like