“Jaws” and Internal Debate Over Who Wrote the USS Indianapolis Speech Symbol

The performance of the “USS Indianapolis” was in charge of the legendary Robert Shaw. jaws It is considered one of the best monologues in the history of cinema. However, the debate over who wrote this moment creates vague waters.

In a hit movie by then-first director Steven Spielberg, released in theaters 47 years ago, the quintet tells Martin Broad (Roy Shader) and Matt Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss) that he is one of 316 survivors. USS Indianapolis disaster of WWII. Indianapolis sank in July 1945 after an Imperial Japanese Navy submarine torpedoed a supply of atomic bomb components during a covert mission in Indianapolis.

There seems to be no doubt that Spielberg had previously explained Spielberg’s description of the Indianapolis moment in the feature film (a reworking of the unwritten script) in just two paragraphs. The director realized that the moment, if done right, could have been Quint’s unusual character study and turning point in the film.

And so the debate begins.

In the film, Spielberg said he asked John Milius, who helped refine the dialogue, to pause the speech because he needed to strengthen it to capture the moment as he saw it in his mind.

Milius is said to have dictated the speech over the phone, followed by a 10-page monologue, “which is basically a lot like a movie,” Spielberg said, adding that the show took a silly speech and cut it. The half. “These are Milius’ words and the montage of the show,” said the director in the film.

Matter appears to be cut and dry, except jaws Co-writer Carl Gottlieb protests the Milius version of the play.

In a previous interview with The Writer’s Guild Foundation (see below), Gottlieb said that it was actually the show that wrote the “USS Indianapolis” speech and that he received millions of years of merit thanks to his friendship with Spielberg.

Gottlieb said that Sackler’s speech was two pages long, not two paragraphs, and that Spielberg asked several of his friends, including Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale (who he would later create). back to the future), word reinforcement and refinement. He admitted that Milius was also invited to participate.

“It was a myth that Milius wrote this speech, but there were 10 versions of this speech, including mine,” Gottlieb said. We gave them to Robert Shaw. Gottlieb noted that at the time of the show’s airing he had already written several novels and plays. A man in a glass cabin.(This is why Gottlieb incorrectly claims the show won the Pulitzer.)

“As soon as, [Shaw] He took everything, made a synthesis. And one night when we were all having dinner, he came in with a bunch of papers and said, “I think I enjoyed the nasty conversation,” Gottlieb recalls. And he did it mostly for the table. And we all said, “Wow.” And Stephen said, “This is what we have.”

Disappointed by the mythological “rumors”, Gottlieb said he went through the production diaries and script to return to the story Milius had written at the last minute and talked about on the phone.

Gottlieb said he was not present at the alleged dictation call, but was at the call the day before, with Milius, discussing the speech. “I kept the records very carefully because I was waiting for the arbitration of this script,” Gottlieb said, adding that, in his opinion, certain elements of the alleged dictatorial call did not fit.

“We read the on-screen version of the program a few days ago. So, in the end, who do you decide to trust, the guy who wasn’t there, who claims to have written it, or the guy who was there and says he didn’t? asked Gottlieb. “I could easily say this was my speech. This was not my speech. Robert Shaw did. Unfortunately, as Johnny and Steven are close friends, Steven has always supported Milius’ version, which is wrong in my opinion.