The player is accused of raping a young girl in a nightclub in Barcelona; the trial should end between Wednesday or Thursday the 8th
Summary
On the third day of the trial against Daniel Alves, accused of rape, the experts in the case were heard. Professionals hired by the player’s defense argue that the lack of injuries on the part of the complainant could mean that the relationship was not so traumatic, but experts who have followed the case deny this.
The third day of the trial of Daniel Alves, accused of raping a young woman in a nightclub in Barcelona, began on Wednesday 7th with the hearing of experts in the case, one of the forensic psychologists who examined the young accused. he of the sexual crime stated that the complainant “got very nervous when he heard someone speaking Portuguese”.
According to the professional, this was one of the criteria to determine the post-traumatic stress that coincided with the young woman’s situation: “When she heard someone speaking Portuguese, she became very nervous,” said the psychologist.
According to her, the young woman suffered from hypervigilance and lack of sleep, another characteristic of post-traumatic stress. Furthermore, according to the professional, the young woman felt guilty for what happened, “one of the indicators of the victim’s situation”.
In addition to the professionals who examined the victim, the medical examiners appointed by the defense also made their statements. One of the professionals hired by the player’s defense stated that, since no intimate injuries were found on the complainant, this makes him think that the sexual intercourse “was not as traumatic” as the young woman claims.
“He talks about slaps, neck grabs… we don’t see wounds on any part of the body. She said she felt an intense level (of pain) while urinating. In my personal experience, when she tells us that it was a painful relationship, it is very strange that we find nothing.”
Blanca Navarro, Alves’ defense psychiatrist, also insisted that the victim’s psychological tests aimed at “absolutely superficial issues”. “It could have been more thorough and the conclusions have some shortcomings.”
Despite the accusations of the professionals hired by the player’s defense, the experts who analyzed the case from the beginning deny that the absence of injuries “does not mean that” sexual violence did not occur.
One of the experts, hired by Daniel Alves’ defense, states that the victim tells the version that “the relationship was painful”, but that there is no injury to prove it. “The absence of swelling (in the intimate area) makes me think that the sexual intercourse was not so traumatic,” he said.
Source: Terra

Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.