Deolane’s speech ban could face court review, lawyer says
Deolane Bezerraat the age of 36, he left the Recife Women’s Penal Colony Monday 9th, after having obtained a habeas corpus. As she left the compound, she was greeted by a crowd of fans and had already failed to comply with two of the court-imposed conditions for being under house arrest.
Get the latest news directly on WhatsApp! Subscribe to the Terra channel
In the Court’s decision, the benefit was granted as long as Deolane use electronic ankle braceletdo not communicate with other suspects in Operation Integration, do not let them house arrestnor on weekends or holidays and do not speak openly to networks, the press or other media.
Before even getting into the car, the influencer He gave short interviews to the press. In his statements, he called his arrest arbitrary and said he was suffering censorship. “This was a criminal arrest, full of abuse of authority by the police chief. I cannot take part in the trial. I have been silenced,” he said. Deolane.
Moments later, he defied another court ruling by posting a photograph on his official Facebook page. Instagram. In the image she appears fully dressed and with her mouth covered with tape. She has the letter “X” drawn on the tape. In the caption of the publication she writes: “Open letter…”. Fans, evidently, interpreted it as a protest against the fact that she could not express herself on social media.
For Professor Amanda Barbalho, who is part of the Commission of Female Lawyers of the Pernambuco Bar Association (OAB-PE), despite the influencer having contested two measures, the impositions are questionable because they include restrictions not foreseen by law. Code of Civil Procedure.
“The precautionary measures have an article in which they [restrições] are listed. This measure where you don’t speak is not on this list, so it is questionable whether it was legal for the court to impose this restriction on you because the law does not provide for it. […] It is a restriction that has not been addressed. Is she prohibited from saying something? Then we already see an abuse in relation to freedom of expression,” the expert told g1.
The professor argues that the precautionary measure imposed by the Court needs to be more specific, because the way it was drawn up leaves the issue completely generic, leaving the whole situation on a precarious path.
“The legality of this restriction and how it would be violated are highly questionable. Since the decision is generic, in theory any demonstration is prohibited. The decision says that she is prohibited from speaking openly. She should not have ‘taken the microphone,’ she should not have said anything,” the teacher stressed.
Regarding the declaration of Deolane Bezerra made on social media, the lawyer confirms that the influencer has challenged justice in unnecessary ways. “She posted a post on Instagram with an ‘X’ in her mouth. She didn’t write anything, but there is a post there with a message. The ‘X’ in her mouth is a demonstration.”
Source: Terra
Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.
