Survivor host Jeff Probst explains if the game’s new twists are getting too complex

Survivor host Jeff Probst explains if the game’s new twists are getting too complex

When CBS ‘ Survived he came back after a long break induced by the pandemic, he came back swinging for the fences. Seasons 41 and 42 saw major changes never seen before in the game, including the reduction of the player’s effective playing time, the production of breaking through the fourth wall, and nearly half a dozen new twists. To be sure, the avalanche of twists and turns at times seemed overly complicated from the viewer’s perspective, and executive producer and animator Jeff Probst investigates whether they really get too complex with their schemes.

To briefly recap, among the new additions to competitive play, so to speak, were the Do-or-Die twist, the Prisoner’s Dilemma, the confused Season 42 Shot in the Dark, 3-Way Tribe Idols, and the Hourglass. . round. And to be fair, each of them created interesting scenarios, if not total chaos, according to at least one former player. (Unless we forget, the cast almost “broke down” in season 42, which hasn’t been seen in a while.) However, Jeff Probst believes that the criticisms of those same twists are just as “fair.” . He said the casing:

Yes, there is always the risk of going too far. It is a real risk. And the scary thing is, you can’t change it after doing it. So you are comfortable with the risk of having a huge failure again. We knew we were doing great. And we anticipate that fans and gamers alike might think it was too much to start with. But we wanted players to re-evaluate everything they thought they knew about Survivor. All.

The strategy certainly had to evolve a bit following the new twists. However, understanding and juggling the vast number of rules and variations of the game became a task in itself, which raised questions about the perceived integrity of the game. The rotation of the hourglass actually sparked an unventilated discussion between the players and Jeff Probst. in season 41, because “flipping” the winning and losing tribes at will seemed too unreasonable. When the dreaded hourglass resurfaced in season 42, fans were almost stunned by what they considered to be the worst twist in the game’s history.

However, Jeff Probst told the outlet that “getting used to” the new rules is part of the philosophy of every new game, not just Survived. She compared it to learning to play poker for the first time, which he said can “seem very complicated until you learn the rules”. However, in this vaunted “new era” of Survivor, things aren’t quite set in stone. Also, apparently, these new additions. Prost continues:

But at your point, we constantly evaluate what works and what doesn’t. If we feel that something isn’t working, we look at it to see if there are any adjustments we can make and if we can’t figure it out, we drop it.

So far, we know that some twists linger for the 43rd and 44th consecutive seasons, based on previous information shared by Jeff Probst. Fans will revisit the prisoner’s dilemma and shooting in the dark, as well as the concept of “winning” the merger. Additionally, the $ 1 million game will once again only last 26 days instead of the previous 39.

However, if we read between the lines correctly here, even if a few twists are thrown into the Survived garbage, it seems like only more will take its place right away … survived 43 be tied to the same fate by trial and error that didn’t work too well for viewers? Find out when it airs September 21 on CBS as part of the 2022 TV lineup!

Source: Cinemablend

You may also like