FPF responds to the letter of San Paolo and recognizes the penalty error in the semifinal

FPF responds to the letter of San Paolo and recognizes the penalty error in the semifinal


The Federation responded to Tricolor’s complaint and admitted the bankruptcy in the capital offer of capital against Palmeiras and promised investigations into the arbitration




Two days before the great final of the Paulist championship, the Paulista Federation responded to a letter from St. Paul on the semifinal penalty in the duel against Palmeiras. The entity admitted the error in the offer that led to the goal of eliminating the tricolor of the state.

“The FPF includes that the field referee should have been called to review the VAR and that the sign of penalty was wrong,” said President Realdo Carneiro Bastos, in an extract from the letter sent to the club.

The document is an answer to the letter sent by Sao Paulo on 11, the day after the game. Tricolor threatened to play the next edition of the championship without his main players and said that the Federation treated the club with contempt.

In another trait, Bastos said he trusted the good character of the referees Flávio Rodrigues de Souza and Rodrigo Guarizo, Var at that moment. The Federation has promised improvements in the arbitration and wishes players to decide the games.

“We will continue to look for the qualification of the referees, with the aim of minimizing the wrong ideas and that the games are always decided by the protagonists of football: athletes,” he said.

Take a look at the answer to San Paolo in full:

“Dear President

The Paulista Football Federation received the letter sent from San Paolo Futebol Club and analyzed the points presented, as well as all the events relating to the match between Palmeiras X Sao Paulo, valid for the semifinal of Paulistão Sicredi 2025.

As is known in San Paolo and all the affiliated clubs that participate in the technical advice and meetings of the football of San Paolo, the current FPF management promotes the dialogue between the club and the Federation, in order to continually improve competitions and every sports ecosystem in the State.

We always receive humblely, any criticism and take an immediate action. We can never be recognized as negligent – it is a fact that all clubs are witnesses. Therefore, it is with respect that we receive all the criticisms of San Paolo Futebol Club.

As regards the penalty offer marked by the field referee and approved by VAR, although it is an interpretative offer, the FPF includes that the field referee should have been called to carry out the review in Var and that the penalty was wrong.

It is important to emphasize that Flavio Rodrigues de Souza and Rodrigo Guarizo do Amaral, who have the shields of Fifa and the work in national and international competitions for years, are right and, like any human being, suffer from any situation of wrong ideas caused. Errors, unfortunately, can happen, we will deeply regret all the damage caused and work intensely to correct them.

Paulistan belongs to clubs. Everyone decides the rules and are partners of the success of this pioneering competition that intensifies local rivalries, involves more than 100 million fans in the country and distribute over $ 1 billion to clubs over the past 4 years.

The FPF is fully convinced that St. Paolo Futebol Club, through his professional and successful management, will continue to contribute profoundly to the collective construction and the constant evolution of the competition.

We always receive humblely, any criticism and take an immediate action. We can never be recognized as negligent – it is a fact that all clubs are witnesses. Therefore, it is with respect that we receive all the criticisms of San Paolo Futebol Club.

As regards the penalty offer marked by the field referee and approved by VAR, although it is an interpretative offer, the FPF includes that the field referee should have been called to carry out the review in Var and that the penalty was wrong.

It is important to emphasize that Flavio Rodrigues de Souza and Rodrigo Guarizo do Amaral, who have the shields of Fifa and the work in national and international competitions for years, are right and, like any human being, suffer from any situation of wrong ideas caused. Errors, unfortunately, can happen, we will deeply regret all the damage caused and work intensely to correct them.

Paulistan belongs to clubs. Everyone decides the rules and are partners of the success of this pioneering competition that intensifies local rivalries, involves more than 100 million fans in the country and distribute over $ 1 billion to clubs over the past 4 years.

The FPF is fully convinced that St. Paolo Futebol Club, through his professional and successful management, will continue to contribute profoundly to the collective construction and the constant evolution of the competition.

We will always be open to develop solutions with San Paolo and all the other clubs so that the wrong problems and ideas are not repeated.

The FPF underlines that it will continue to work tirelessly for continuous improvements in the arbitration, which is in particular the best in Brazil. Not by chance, we were pioneers in the implementation of the centralized Var and, at the end of 2025, we brought, unprecedented to the country, the semi -automatic impediment.

We will continue to look for the qualification of the referees, with the aim of minimizing the wrong ideas and that the games are always decided by the protagonists of football: athletes. And we will work to increase the investment in arbitration every year, which in 2024 has already exceeded $ 6.5 million.

Finally, I want to reiterate my apologies to goalkeeper Rafael, who has already been made by telephone and publicly advertised. There was a scarcely positioned event, which implied that Rafael would be the culprit for the penalty offer, which is not true.

Best regards,

Reinaldo Carneiro Bastos “.

Follow our content on social networks: Bluesky, Threads, Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

Source: Terra

You may also like