Cinemajames Cameron criticizes ‘oppenheimer’ and promises to address the impact of atomic bombs on a new movie

The filmmaker James Cameron (Titanic) rekindled the debate on the representation of atomic bombing in the cinema by commenting on the approach to Christopher Nolan in OPPENHEIMER. Second Cameronthe film, despite its worldwide success and recognition in the Oscars, avoided showing the direct consequences of the bombs released on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. For the director, Nolan’s decision to focus exclusively from the protagonist’s perspective, J. Robert Oppenheimer, resulted in a “moral deviation”, as it did not expose the suffering of the Japanese victims.

In recent interviews, Cameron He pointed out that while admiring the technical and narrative quality of the feature, he missed a more explicit representation of the horrors experienced by the affected population. He stressed that there is only a brief scene in which the main character reacts to post-bombed images, but considered that the movie “avoided the central theme” by not showing the real devastation caused by nuclear explosions.

Cameron’s new project promises to portray Hiroshima’s tragedy

While remaining involved in the franchise Avatar, James Cameron announced that it is developing a new movie about the atomic bomb, inspired by the book Ghosts of hiroshimafrom Charles Pellegrino. The director stated that he intends to directly address the impact of bombs on the Japanese population, bringing out reports of survivors and the scenario of destruction left after the attacks.

Cameron He stated that he does not intend to enter political debates about the historical justifications of the use of bombs, but to portray what happened from the perspective of the victims. The goal is to provide the public with a deeper understanding of the human consequences of the event, going beyond the perspective of scientists and military involved in the development of nuclear weaponry.

Christopher Nolan argues narrative choice of OPPENHEIMER

In response to criticism, Christopher Nolan explained that his intention was to tell the story from the subjective point of view of OPPENHEIMER. According to the director, the scientist learned of the effects of the bomb while the rest of the world, and the film sought to portray the psychological and moral impact of this discovery. Nolan stated that the decision not to show explicit scenes of destruction was a conscious choice to maintain the emotional and narrative integrity of the work.

Despite the controversy, OPPENHEIMER It was widely praised by critics and the public, becoming one of the greatest box office hits of 2023. The debate on the way of portraying sensitive historical events, however, remains prominent, especially with Cameron’s promise to approach the theme from a new perspective.

Expectation for the new movie about Hiroshima

With the project announcement Ghosts of hiroshimaexpectation around the approach that James Cameron will give to the theme. The director has already signaled that he intends to realistically show the experience of survivors and the lasting impact of atomic bombs. The proposal is to broaden the look at one of the most striking episodes of the twentieth century, contributing to the reflection on the consequences of war and the role of cinema in collective memory.

The new film has no definite debut date yet, but promises to rekindle discussions about ethics, historical responsibility and cinematic representation of human tragedies.

Source:Indiewire

Also read:Amazon reveals a list of favorites for the next James Bond and surprises fans

What was the best movie of 2025 so far? Vote for your favorite!

• Anora
• Conclave
• Perfect escort
• Flower
• The brutalist
• A complete unknown
• Mickey 17
• Victory
• Sinners
• Thunderbolts*
• Man with h
• Karate Kid: Legends
• Premonition 6: Blood Ties
• Lilo & Stitch
• Mission: Impossible – The Final Set
• How to train your dragon
• Extermination: Evolution
• Elio
• M3gan 2.0
• F1: The Movie