Know who the 14 deputies for the revolt are punished and what can happen to each

Boconists should be punished for taking control of the representative chamber as a sign of protest in favor of Bolsonaro; The Pettista deputy can be responsible for aggression

Brasilia – The mayor, Hugo Motta (Republicans-PB)sent to the parliamentary correctediaria a representation against 14 deputies of Bolsonarist involved in Motim in the plenary of the house In the last week.

The list is made up of names of deputies who have already represented by other colleagues and others that Motta himself has done. The house was 30 hours blocked by the pockets, Until the release On Wednesday morning.

In addition to the 14 parliamentarians who worked to prevent the Chamber of the Chamber as a sign of protest against the arrest of the Chamber of former President Jair Bolsonaro (PL), Mrs. Camila Jara (PT-MS) was denounced by aggression by the attack by Deputy Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG) in the middle of the table. Denies the accusation.

The accompanying, deputy colonel Diego (PSD-Ba), who has an meeting scheduled with Motta on Monday 11, should forward the statements to Ethical advice. The Council will be responsible for evaluating the punishment to deputies.

Started with the greatest number of deputies among those represented, the PL has issued a note in which it provides solidarity with them and states that the action had “peaceful and legitimate character”.

Look who has been reported to correctediaria

Allan Garcês (PP-MA)

Accused of acts with protagonists who extrapolated the constitutional and regimental limits of the parliamentary activity, which constitute a manifest violation of the parliamentary decor and to act in an deliberated, coordinated and persistent way, physically occupying the premises of the Board of Directors to prevent the installation and continuity of the plenar sessions.

Bia Kicis (PL-DF)

Accused of acts with protagonists who extrapolated the constitutional and regimental limits of the parliamentary activity, they constituted a manifest violation of the parliamentary decor and to act deliberately, coordinated and persistent, physically occupying the premises of the Council to prevent the installation and regular continuity of the plenary sessions. He says that “there are no precedents at home to punish the table” and that “this movement has always been understood as legitimate resistance”.

Carlos Jordy (PL)

Accused of acts with protagonists who extrapolated the constitutional and regimental limits of the parliamentary activity, which constitute a manifest violation of the parliamentary decor and to act in an deliberated, coordinated and persistent way, physically occupying the premises of the Board of Directors to prevent the installation and continuity of the plenar sessions. The deputy shared the news on the 14 reported to Correctoria and said: “If the price to be paid for the struggle for freedom, against tyranny and justice to the victims of January 8 is this, I am willing to face courage and peace in my heart. My mother did not give a coward!”.

Carol de Toni (PL-SC)

Accused of acts with protagonists who extrapolated the constitutional and regimental limits of the parliamentary activity, which constitute a manifest violation of the parliamentary decor and to act in an deliberated, coordinated and persistent way, physically occupying the premises of the Board of Directors to prevent the installation and continuity of the plenar sessions.

Domingos Sávio (PL-MG)

Accused of acts with protagonists who extrapolated the constitutional and regimental limits of the parliamentary activity, which constitute a manifest violation of the parliamentary decor and to act in an deliberated, coordinated and persistent way, physically occupying the premises of the Board of Directors to prevent the installation and continuity of the plenar sessions.

Luciano Zucco (PL-GRS)

Accused of acts with protagonists who extrapolated the constitutional and regimental limits of the parliamentary activity, which constitute a manifest violation of the parliamentary decor and to act in an deliberated, coordinated and persistent way, physically occupying the premises of the Board of Directors to prevent the installation and continuity of the plenar sessions. The opposition leader declared, in a declaration, which is “inadmissible that now, acting in defense of freedom and against abuses, the opposition is criminalized. The simple postponement of a complaint to internal affairs is no sanction. On the contrary: it is one more reason for the right to remain united and intensify the fight against the arbitration of a state that is no longer democratic.”

Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG)

Accused of challenging the order of closing the employment, even in the face of the threat of the legislative police, which holds the president of the presidency and repeatedly refuses to free it and simulate aggressiveness to “generate public victimization narrative” (the latter accusation made of the PT).

Marcel Van Hattem (Novo-T)

Accused of having prevented members of the Board of Directors to occupy the seat to resume the functioning of the house when sitting in the chair of the Presidency. A new party says so “Parliamentary obstruction is a legitimate and traditional tool of political game, widely used by the left when it opposes, without any sanction” and that Van Hattem undergoes persecution.

Marco Feliciano (PL-SP)

Accused of acts with protagonists who extrapolated the constitutional and regimental limits of the parliamentary activity, which constitute a manifest violation of the parliamentary decor and to act in an deliberated, coordinated and persistent way, physically occupying the premises of the Board of Directors to prevent the installation and continuity of the plenar sessions. He says that “they want to be silent 14 of us”: “I knew that fighting for justice would have been a price and I am willing to pay that price”.

SUPRENES CARCANTE (PL-RJ)

Accused of acts with protagonists who extrapolated the constitutional and regimental limits of the parliamentary activity, which constitute a manifest violation of the parliamentary decor and to act in an deliberated, coordinated and persistent way, physically occupying the premises of the Board of Directors to prevent the installation and continuity of the plenar sessions. The deputy says Expect an analysis of “Balance, Serenity and Justice” from the accompanying and that the bench will present its defense belief that the deposit is the only possible result: “There is no device that prohibits the legitimate act that we perform this week”.

Zé Trovão (PL-SC)

Accused of trying to physically prevent Motta’s climb in the chair of the presidency. The barrier was made with his body, using the leg to hinder the access scale at the table.

Marcos Polon (PL-MS)

Accused of having prevented members of the Board of Directors to occupy the seat to resume the functioning of the house when sitting on the president of the Presidency and to offend Motta during a public act in Campo Grande the previous Sunday. The deputy defended himself with a video on the networks in which he says he is autistic and did not understand what was happening on the board of directors when Motta’s arrival.

Julia Zanatta (PL-SC)

Accused of using his daughter as a “shield” to prevent the resumption of the plenary, causing “improper exposure to the risk environment and institutional tension”. The deputy says that he took his daughter because “he is breastfeeding and depends on her:” I did not take it as a shield, how the most disgusting beings of our policy and those who played my tweet are accused. I took because I am a mother. “

Paulo Bilynskyj (PL-SP)

Accused of being one of the protagonists of the forced employment of the table, preventing and limiting the functioning of the session and also to attack the journalist Guga Noblat, from the ICL Notícias. He published a note that said: “I participated and I will continue to participate in all the necessary movements to guide Aistia, the impeachment of Alexandre de Moraes and the end of the privileged forum.

Camila Jara (PT-MS)

Accused of physically attacked Nikolas Ferreira after the eviction of the Board of Directors. The deputy denies aggression. The PT bench in the house said that “during the confusion generated by the deputies of Bolsonarist during yesterday’s session, Camila Jara, who tried to approach the President of the Chamber, Hugo Motta, protected only from the push push started by the far -right members, including deputy Nikolas Ferreira.”

Source: Terra

Rose

Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.