The government base states that Fux behaved as a defense of Bolsonaro: “boring, long and inconsistent vote”

The minister voted to fulfill the former president Jair Bolsonaro in the process of the plot of the coup d’état

The deputies of the base of power criticized the vote of Minister Luiz Fux of the Supreme Court (Stf), who absolutely has the former president Jair Bolsonaro (PL) in the process of the plot of the coup. In a session that analyzes the criminal action 2668, which investigates the trial attempts, the parliamentarians accused Fux of exceeding the limits of the judicial action by adopting a position that have classified as “incompatible with their function” and similar to that of a defense lawyer.

• Receive the main news directly on WhatsApp! Sign up for the Earth channel

Deputy Lindbergh Farias (PT-RJ) made an analogy to criticize the logic of votes. “Is it the fault of the fish. Sharks? No! They were not part of any criminal organization.”

The parliamentarian added that “when the supreme is attacked by the government of the United States and the extreme right, the vote of Minister Fux goes beyond the defense lawyers, who were trying to reduce the sanctions. And attacks the supreme, demonizes the supreme at that moment.”

Farias also characterized the demonstration as “a vote, sometimes, with hints of provocation” and claimed to expect a vote of “consistency”.

See Fux’s vote to fulfill Jair Bolsonaro by all the crimes attributed by Pgr: ‘There are not enough tests:

• Frequent

  

  See Fux’s vote to fulfill Jair Bolsonaro by all the crimes attributed by Pgr: “There are not enough evidence”

• Frequent

  

  After 8 hours of vote, Fux says it shouldn’t end: “I stay until it takes”

• Frequent

  

  Fux minimizes Bolsonaro’s meeting with military commanders: “I don’t need to convince them”

Deputy Rogério Correia (PT-MG) has criticized the duration of the vote, which already takes almost 10 hours. “The vote is long, boring and inconsistent. Why does it blame Mauro Cid to be part of an attempt to violently abolish the state of democratic law, so Mauro Cid was sentenced by him, but who was interested in Bolsonaro, there is no conviction.”

For the parliamentarian, Fux did not make a joint analysis of all the evidentiary elements. “It does not join in historical facts. It cites every fact as if it were separated from another. In the case of Moraes, it makes exactly a connection from history. So when you disconnect from history and you see each separate fact, take exactly the content that happened. I think they prepared it within a positivist idea of ​​the law and negotiation of the story.”

Ivan Valente (PSOL-SP) also criticized the duration and focus of the vote. “He said he wouldn’t discuss preliminaries and spent three hours talking about it.” The parliamentarian added: “First of all he will fire all the lawyers, because he was Bolsonaro’s great lawyer. They will lose his work. He went beyond the pockets compared to lawyers”.

Valente also suggested external motivations. “Secondly, he wants to please the outside,” he said, referring to the United States. “I have never seen a minister consuming himself so much in a process, and more, he was disrespectful for the supreme set, his colleagues and also the prosecutor,” he added.

Expectations for the next votes

The deputies have shown that the following votes could rebalance the process. Lindbergh Farias included: “Tomorrow will be a very important day, Minister Cámen Lúcia, the vote of Minister Zanin, arrives. Surely, in my evaluation, Moraes will ask to separate to refute these impropriety that today”.

Rogério Correia also expressed confidence. “I think that tomorrow the vote of Cámen Lúcia, from Zanin, will certainly resume this necessary story that was built in the vote of Alexandre Moraes.”

The government base said to argue that, despite what was discussed in Fux’s vote, the final result will be the condemnation of Bolsonaro and its allies for participating in the plot of the coup.

Source: Terra

Rose

Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.