Video arbitration did not recommend reviewing a possible penalty in Tapia because he believed that Allan slipped
The Board of Directors of San Paolo met the CBF on Monday night (06) and had access to the audio of controversial moves in the classic against Palmeiras. The club’s football executive, Rui Costa, had a meeting for videoconferences with Rodrigo Cintra and Pericles Bassols, who command the entity referee committee.
According to the journalist André Hernan, Rui Costa listened to the narrative of the video referee in controversial moves. Ilbert Estevam da Silva did not recommend the revision in the offer of Tapia because he believed that the defensive midfielder Allan slipped into the game. In addition, Var also analyzed that the Chilean could not reach the ball. In another offer claimed by Tricolor, there was no revision of the revision for a possible red card for Andreas Pereira for considering that the midfielder had arrived in the ball before.
Audios advertising came after the president of the club, Julio Cazares, to protest for a break in the protocol. After all, since the offers have not been revised in the countryside, there is no diffusion of Audios on the CBF website. The studies on the entity that left the public material on Tuesday (07), due to the pressure pressure.
San Paolo complains of at least five arbitration decisions in the defeat for Palmeiras. The main ones are the penalty not marked in Tapia and the non -expulsion of Andreas Pereira. Sunday evening (05), after the game, the CBF announced the removal of the referee Ramon Abatti Abel and Ilbert.
Follow our content on social networks: Bluesky, Threads, Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.
Source: Terra
Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.
