Released in our theaters this Wednesday, April 13th, does “Dumbledore’s Mysteries” confirm some of the theories in vogue about Hogwarts director Jude Law? Find out the answer with spoilers.
Warning – The article below contains spoilers for “Fantastic Beasts 3” as it discusses some of the movie’s revelations. Please continue if you have not seen it yet.
When the subtitles for Fantastic Beasts 3 were revealed, the fans jumped. Because they already had little idea of the mystery of Dumbledore, which the feature film promised to reveal, several theories were spread about Hogwarts director Jude Law performing in front of David Yates camera. And they mostly relate to his family.
Faith in faith
At the end of the previous episode, Grindelwald (then Johnny Depp) revealed to Croyan Belbose (Ezra Miller) that his real name was Aurelius Dumbledore. With this he became the brother of Albus, whose existence was so hidden that J.K. Rowling is never mentioned in his novels, nor in the Saga films, whose events take place several decades before Harry Potter.
So it seemed obvious that the sequel would go back to this story, especially with such a title. And it’s true. With nuances: Yes, Aurelius is really Dumbledore. No, he’s not Albus’s brother, but … his nephew, son Aberfort (Richard Coyle) left him. After doubting his relationship with the Hogwarts director, Fantastic Beasts 3 confirms this and allows him to return to the light who Grindelwald plunged into darkness after this revelation. But that is not all.
Fantastic Beasts 3: (Aurelius) Dumbledore Mysteries
What happened to Ariana?
Because the film promises to reveal Dumbledore’s secrets. In the plural. Although confirmed on the very first stage (except in China, where an obvious part of the dialogue was censored), his romantic relationship with Grindelwald was not really as it was done by J.K. The mystery surrounding the fate of Ariana, Albus’s late sister, remains to be seen. And Fantastic Beasts 3 does. ბოლოსAt the end.
From the first part of the spin-off / Prequel, many viewers noticed that the uncontrollable forces of Credence resembled the forces of Ariana mentioned in the book. “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows”. And concludes that he was probably also an obscure, a name given to wizards and witches who suppress their magical abilities to the point that a parasitic power is formed in them.
Ariana Dumbledore
A theory that clearly gained momentum at the end of Grindelwald’s crimes when it was discovered that Croyans was part of the Dumbledore family. And which is evidenced today in a dialogue where Albus returns to power and fate to his dead sister, whom he may have accidentally killed during a confrontation with his brother and his former lover and future enemy. Germain “Blurred” It is also mentioned there that there should be no room for doubt.
It is possible that there was a flashback to the show as photos stolen from the set were shown in the role of young actress Ariana Dumbledore. But these scenes are not the last cut and it is only presented thanks to the picture we first saw in the movie Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.
However, Fantastic Beasts 3 specifies that the powers of Credence / Aurelius and Ariana are quite different, with other theories suggesting that the young man actually possessed the obscura’s of a young woman. This is to explain the appearance of this member of the Dumbledore family, who has never been mentioned anywhere, on screen or on paper. But he belongs to the bloodline and is therefore the nephew of Albus.
That being said, which theory about the Harry Potter saga do you hope to prove in a potential episode 4?
Source: allocine
Emily Jhon is a product and service reviewer at Gossipify, known for her honest evaluations and thorough analysis. With a background in marketing and consumer research, she offers valuable insights to readers. She has been writing for Gossipify for several years and has a degree in Marketing and Consumer Research from the University of Oxford.
