Sertanejo says that the accusations are old and have already been resolved in court
According to the editorialist Fábia Oliveira, of Portal Metróples, between family repercussions and unexpected divorce of nearby people, Leonardo faces another judicial dispute that involves a controversial episode of his career. The compatriot presented a defense in a cause intended by the businessman Jan Nicolau, who accuses him of publicly resumed the old declarations related to an alleged default in a show.
According to Jan, the singer’s recent lines rekindled a topic dating back to 2005, when Leonardo, during a live participation in the Faustão program, would have suggested that the entrepreneur had exceeded background checks for a cultural event. The case, at the time, had a great repercussion and ended in court.
In the judicial response delivered on July 28, Leonardo claims that there was no new accusation against Jan Nicolau and that the recent statements mentioned in the trial do not mention the name of the businessman.
The artist also claims to have never attributed the illegal conduct to the plaintiff. He claims that the famous phrase dictated live – “ô Jean, sends my money, bad” – would have been generic and not specifically directed to the singer in January, the association between the episode and the businessman would have been built by the press itself and the popular imagination.
In addition, Leonardo stresses that the entire dispute has already been analyzed and closed by the court in the past. At the time, Jan received compensation from Rede Globo and Fausto Silva, as well as public excuses made by the singer himself. For the defense, the new process represents an attempt to obtain a financial income without reserve, reopening an already solved problem.
Leonardo: the origin of the conflict
The cheat began when Jan Nicolau, then councilor of Jaboticabal, supported a cultural event with shows in 2006. Leonardo participated in the program and, shortly after, he made comment on Faustão program relating to the name “Jean” with the non -payment of the cache.
The detail is that the real contractor was Jean Marcelo Veronezzinot Jan Nicholas. The similarity in the names would have led to confusion. In court, it has been shown that the director was not responsible for hiring or payments.
Leonardo, recognizing the wrong idea, made public apologies during a show, admitting the error. The question seemed to be resolved: until, years later, the singer would mention the episode in interviews and podcasts, reopening old wounds according to the businessman.
Jan says that these new mention have rekindled doubts about his honor and re -associated with his name with an existing non -fulfillment. Therefore, seek a new moral damage departments in court.
Source: Terra

Earl Johnson is a music writer at Gossipify, known for his in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the industry. A graduate of USC with a degree in Music, he brings years of experience and passion to his writing. He covers the latest releases and trends, always on the lookout for the next big thing in music.