Ashley Judd says she is pushing to change a Tennessee law that would allow police reports to be released after authorities questioned Judd’s family following the trauma of her mother Naomi’s death, which left them traumatized and the actress remains a possible suspicion in the death of his mother.
In the article published in the article. The New York Times newspaper on Wednesday along with a series of tweetsJudd found his mother dead at age 79 and even had several emotionally demanding and traumatic interactions with authorities, the details of which may now be in the public domain. It’s what it says to “raise awareness, reduce stigma, help people identify and make sure we all know we are facing mental illness together,” he tweeted.
“The trauma of finding and taking over her birthing body haunts me at night,” Judd wrote in the book. First. “While my family and I continue to mourn our loss, the cruel and widespread misinformation that has been spread about his death and our relationship brings my days to a standstill.”
The actress says the pain and horror “will only get worse” if police reports, which include unclear details about her mother’s death, are released in the United States. In the article, he specifically points to Tennessee’s laws governing sealed cases that allow details of toxicology reports and autopsies to become a public record.
The double risk The actor says the family’s decision to go to court in early August to prevent these police reports from being released is to protect them from invasion of privacy and re-traumatization. But his call for new legislation in Washington and the states in his article also resonates with other families who have similar experiences. They include Vanessa Bryant, whose husband, LA Lakers legend Kobe, and daughter Gianna died in a helicopter crash, photos of which were posted online without the family’s consent. (Bryant was recently awarded $16 million in emotional distress for photos of the accident.)
And Judd argues that “deeply intimate personal and medical information does not belong in the press, the Internet, or anywhere other than our memory.” There, he said, “raw details are only used to fuel the gossip economy, and since we cannot rely on basic human decency, we need laws to enforce this restriction.”
“We ask the court not to release these documents because we have secrets,” says Ashley. “We asked why intimacy in death is a death with more dignity. And for those who are gone, privacy will prevent further harm to a family that has already been permanently and painfully changed.”
The operation resulted from four interviews with him and his family, in which he was interrogated by the police on the day of his mother’s death, at a time when everyone was “completely vulnerable”, he says. The experience left him feeling helpless and cornered. He also left little time to ask his own questions, including: “Where and how will what I share be stored, used and made available to the public?”
The Warm The actor says the family has shared about his country music legend mother “her mental illness and tortuous history” through “horrific, outdated interview procedures and methods of dealing with family members who are in a state of distress.”
According to the actor, authorities were just following procedures, but the experience left the family “living sensitive boundaries, questioned and, in my case, as possible suspects in my mother’s suicide.” In the wake of the emotionally difficult experience, the Golden Globe and Emmy nominee calls for reform not only of the laws governing the public nature of such information, but also of the processes by which family members challenge authorities.
“While I recognize the need for a police investigation into sudden and violent death by suicide, there is absolutely no public interest in the mother’s case that warrants publishing the videos, photos and family interviews that were conducted during this investigation.” . “, she writes.” On the contrary. The release of this material does not only cause irreparable harm to the family; It can act as an infection in a population vulnerable to self-harm.”
He says this interaction can “break up grieving families and then exacerbate their traumatic pain by going public.” The time The 2017 Person of the Year for breaking the silence amid Hollywood’s #MeToo movement, along with the current process and ability to make this type of information public, can take away an individual’s choice about when, how and whether to share their trauma.
“I enjoyed digging deep personal wounds into the spotlight before. The stories I’ve told about sexual abuse and its aftermath are mine. In my quest for justice, I used them to catalyze change. When we take the time to process and heal trauma and reveal its causes in our own way, we can become effective public defenders,” he wrote. “But people should never share their wounds with the public until they are ready, if at all.”
If you or someone you know is having suicidal thoughts, contact the 988 Suicide and Crisis Line by calling or texting 988 or go to 988lifeline.org.
Source: Hollywood Reporter
Camila Luna is a writer at Gossipify, where she covers the latest movies and television series. With a passion for all things entertainment, Camila brings her unique perspective to her writing and offers readers an inside look at the industry. Camila is a graduate from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) with a degree in English and is also a avid movie watcher.
