Kim Kardashian dropped the defamation lawsuit against Blac Chyna

Kim Kardashian dropped the defamation lawsuit against Blac Chyna

On Friday, a judge dismissed part of a case against Kim Kardashian in the court of former reality TV star Black China before a jury could hear the remaining elements.

Judge Gregory Alarcón ruled that China’s lawyer Lin Xi’an did not make defamatory statements against Kardashian during the trial.

The contract interference case against Kardashian is still alive. The jury, on the first full day of hearing, awards this and the libel and breach of contract cases against Chris Jenner, Khloe Kardashian and Kylie Jenner.

The lawsuit in China alleges the women falsely told TV producers and executives that Chana viciously attacked her then-fiancé Rob Kardashian in December 2016 in an attempt to get her reality show. steal and chinaCalled off.

Cyan argued during a final discussion on Thursday afternoon that the women had no reason to believe in the attack because testimonies, photos and videos from the time showed that Rob Kardashian was not seriously injured.

“I had no sign of it,” Cyan said. “They didn’t call the police, they didn’t go to the hospital, there were no gangs.”

Kardashian’s attorney, Michael Rhodes, argued at the time of closing that the women had every reason to believe reports of the attack on Rob Kardashian and Chris Jenner’s longtime friend Corey Gamble, which ended the feud and was a witness. .

“Do you remember how Robbie was at the booth yesterday?” “Your pain from him was real,” Rhodes said. “This is a real family. Yes, they are famous, but they are real people. “He was seriously injured here.”

Ciani provided us with vivid examples of text and email ads from Chris Jenner, Khloe Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner telling the show’s producers and E! The show’s network has appeared in settlements with allegations of abuse.

But the case he opened against Kim Kardashian was more vague.

After Alarcon read the jury instructions on Thursday, Rhodes noted that there were no potentially defamatory statements from Kim Kardashian.

Cyan was angered by the appeal, but a frustrated judge reprimanded him, saying that he had accepted the jury’s instructions before the trial.

A similar argument emerged in court on Friday over Alarcon’s unusual method of jury selection. Instead of choosing 12 jurors and four alternates, trial attorneys selected 16 jurors and then, after closing arguments, randomly selected the four alternates.

The judge again pointed out to Cyan that he had agreed to the trial in court.

In the civil case, nine of the 12 jurors had to agree that the three Kardashian defendants knowingly lied to Chana about insulting Rob Kardashian, or spreading the word by recklessly ignoring the truth. The same number must decide whether it illegally interfered with China’s contract E! Liquid.

Source: Hollywood Reporter

You may also like