The jury in the Black China lawsuit gave the Kardashians a big win

On Monday, jurors gave the Kardashian family a major victory in a lawsuit brought by former reality TV star Black China against them.

The Los Angeles jury found that none of the famous family members insulted China or interfered with anything in their contract with the E! The network cancels its reality show robbery and china.

The four Kardashian defendants attended nearly the entire trial, but when the verdict was read, they were all at the Met Gala in New York, where this year’s theme was “Glamour Plated in Gold.”

China was in court to sentence. He had no visible reaction.

After about 10 hours of deliberation, the jury decided in the form of a grand jury that the Kardashians often acted in bad faith and found they had no justification to tell bailiffs and producers. robbery and china That China abused her son and brother, Rob Kardashian. But they found that this had no material impact on the contract with China or the fate of the show, and he received no compensation.

Executives E! This is demonstrated by the network that launched the program. robbery and china It ended because the relationship ended and not because of the actions of the accused.

The jury was hearing a defamation case against Chris Jenner, Khloe Kardashian and Kylie Jenner after a judge dropped part of a lawsuit against Kim Kardashian during the hearing.

All four women testified at the nine-day trial.

The trial focused on allegations that China viciously attacked her then-fiancé and reality TV co-star Rob Kardashian in the night and morning of December 2016. She attacked and beat him with a metal bat. He testified that he had a shotgun strapped to his neck and was happily holding a gun as they both celebrated the reality show’s resumption, and when the celebration turned into an argument, he was never violent with him.

But the legal issues the jury considered were about the outcome of that fight. The jury had to decide whether each of the defendants lied about the deliberate insult when they discussed it with the producers and executives who oversaw it. robbery and china, Or spread the word about it by recklessly neglecting the truth. And they had to decide for each of the defendants whether those communications were unlawful interference with China’s contract to appear on the show.

In her closing argument, Chinese lawyer Lin Qian argued that it was unreasonable for the four women to believe their client had violently assaulted her ex-boyfriend Rob Kardashian.

“He didn’t have any marks on him,” Cyan told the jury. “They didn’t call the police, they didn’t go to the hospital, there were no gangs.”

Kardashian’s attorney, Michael Rhodes, argued in his closing that the women had every reason to believe reports of the attack on Corey Gamble, a longtime friend of Rob Kardashian and Chris Jenner, who arrived at the scene and ended the argument.

“Remember how Robbie looked on the bench?” “Your pain from him was real,” Rhodes said. “This is a real family. Yes, they are famous, but they are real people. “He was seriously injured here.”

During the trial, it appeared that Gamble would be the main witness for the defense. But TV executives and producers, whose testimonies were often technical and dramatic, were considered more important in the jury’s conclusions, making stories of violence against women largely irrelevant.

Jurors were free to make that decision bilaterally: against some Kardashians and not against others.

Instead, they gave the family a clean slate and gave China nothing.

5 years ago, the court cleared many obstacles, including dismissal motions and negotiations between the two parties, and even dragged itself to trial.

But the final hurdle, convincing the jury, was overcome.