The final verdict on the criminal process of Edu Guedes against Alexandre Correa

What did justice decided?

The group of criminal appeals of the Court of Justice of San Paolo rejected the appeal presented by the defense of Edu Guedes unanimously. The collegiate judges reiterated that the declarations of Alexandre Correa It has not configured any behavior that can be framed as a crime against honor.

The defense of CorkBy means of a note, he stressed that the Court underlined the absence of specific intent (criminal intention) on the business man lines. The Court stressed that subjective interpretations cannot be distorted to prove a criminal accusation, as regards the principles of legality and typicality. In other words, the irony of Cork Information on the situation, although uncomfortable for Guedes, did not reach the level of the crime before the law.

The origin of the dispute and the accusation of Guedes

The judicial income began after Alexandre Correa has manifested himself publicly in an ironic and aggressive tone on the relationship of his ex -wife, Ana Hickmann, with Edu Guedes. In the declarations, Correa referred to himself as “horn”, suggesting that there was an extramarital involvement between the chef and the presenter while he and Dwarf They were still married.

Edu Guedes supported in the criminal complaint that the insinuations of Cork They had damaged him in a professional way, coloring his reputation and giving him the image of “traitor” in front of the public and the market. However, the Court believed that the narrative and tone of Correa’s speech, even controversial, did not adapt to the legal definition of defamation.

Implications of the verdict

With the decision of the Court, the criminal proceedings against Alexandre Correa For defamation is finalized definitively. Absolution strengthens the complexity of the right of expression with respect to the crime against honor in the context of social networks and the media of celebrities. Although the chef has not been successful in the criminal sphere, the verdict does not prevent him from seeking a reposition for any moral damages in the civil sphere if he chooses to proceed with the dispute in a new front.

The decision places a final point in one of the numerous disputes involving the separation ofand Ana Hickmann and Alexandre Correa, But the tension between the parties, now involved in divorce and activities, is far from an end.

View this post on Instagram

The post shared by Ana Hickmann (@ahickmann)

Source: Terra

Amanda

I am Amanda Gans, a motivated and ambitious professional in the news writing industry. With over five years of experience in this field, I have developed an eye for detail and an ability to craft stories that captivate readers. I currently write for Gossipify, where I specialize in beauty & celebrities news. My passion lies with exploring the world of beauty through writing, interviewing experts and developing articles that are both informative and entertaining.