Brunette Bianincardi, wife of Neymar Jr, fought a cause against the owner of his home in Cotia, San Paolo; Know what happened
Brunette biancardi He called the Court against the owner of a housing for rent for R $ 41.008.18 in Cotia, San Paolo, supporting the violation of privacy and constant disorders. The influencer reported that he had been observed by the internal cameras after the owner of the property asked himself about his pets, confessing messages that have maintained access to the equipment even after having ensured to exclude the application and replace the password.
In the process, the wife of Neymar Jr. He says he was the subject of inadequate photos of photos with the player and other improper interferences by the lessee and his wife. The situation worsened when the influencer was insulted in reporting on a judicial quote for the owner. It required the termination of the contract, the refund of security of $ 139,690.73 and compensation for moral damage of R $ 10,000, but the case was subsequently resolved in a friendly and archived way.
To better understand the cheat, we talked to the criminal lawyer Dr. Marcio Pires. According to the expert, the act of maintaining access to the cameras is a clear violation of family privacy: “This configures a direct violation of the right to intimacy and private life, constitutionally protected by article 5, article X, of the federal Constitution. Condurate characterized by article 154-a of the criminal code known as Carolina Dieckmann Law, punishable from 3 months to 1 year and a fine.”
The professional also says that if the owner does not abandon practice, things worsen: “In case of insistence on monitoring or contact, it can configure the crime of article 147-a of the penal code, with a prison penalty from 6 months to 2 years and a stalking crime.”
Non -contractual conformity
Information on this part of the process, Pires explains that the tests obtained by the owner are illegal images, which can cause even more problems: “Get tests with illegal means damages the principle of good contractual faith (art. 422 of the civil code) and can be considered null for judicial purposes, according to the consolidated jurisprudence.”
Moral damage
The lawyer continues to explain that yes, Bruna and Neymar have the total right to request moral compensation for what happened: “The exposure of the family routine, including requests for photos with Neymar, goes beyond the limits of the tenants’ relationship and constitutes an abusive conduct. If there is a financial loss, such as change or safety costs, it can also be claimed compensation. Bruna claims $ 10,000 for moral damage, which is legally plausible, given the embarrassment generated by a non -authorization.”
Source: Terra
Ashley Fitzgerald is a journalist and author at Gossipify, known for her coverage of famous people and their lives. She writes about a wide range of topics, including celebrities, influencers, social media stars, and public figures. Her articles are known for their in-depth analysis and unique perspective. She is respected for her ability to keep readers up to date with the latest news and trends of the famous people.
