Neymar and Bruna Biancardi leave Palazzo in San Paolo after discovering the monitoring of the cameras

Neymar and Bruna Biancardi leave Palazzo in San Paolo after discovering the monitoring of the cameras

Neymar Jr. and Bruna Biancardi recently left the house in Cotia, Greater San Paolo, after identifying internal cameras managed by the owner without the due consent. The discovery, according to reports, occurred after the couple created strange movements and confirms that the equipment recorded their routine in an unauthorized way.




The influencer presented a court order to terminate the lease, the return of R $ 123,000 paid as safety and allowance for moral damages. In the process, he also reported invasions on privacy, including the entrance of the owner on the property to request photos with the player.

According to the case of the case, the owner of the property and his wife admitted to having accompanied the couple’s activities through the cameras. However, they later said they had no more access to the images. On the other hand, Bruna’s defense stressed that the situation configured the disorder of quiet, harassment and non -compliance with the conditions for the peaceful use of the property.

The lawyer Ana Carolina Chaves de Almeida, specialist in real estate law, explained that, also as a justification for safety, the owner cannot maintain supervision in private areas after the start of the lease, except that the tenant and limited to ordinary and external spaces. “The owner cannot maintain any type of surveillance in private areas after the tenant’s mandate, with the exception of preventive consent, expressed and only in common and external areas, for justified and specific purposes.”

He stressed that the installation of cameras in intimate environments, such as bedrooms and bathrooms, is prohibited in any circumstance, to violate the right to intimacy guaranteed by the Constitution. In addition, according to the expert, the conduct can configure crimes as “unauthorized registration of sexual intimacy” and stalking, as well as giving compensation for moral damage.

The case also included the statements that the bailiffs participated in the residence several times to deliver quotations and accusations relating to the investigations against the returns by other crimes, which, according to Bruna’s defense, compromised a further stay in the place. The monthly property of the property was stipulated at R $ 41.008.18.

To strengthen similar actions, Ana Carolina advises that tenants make detailed inspections in the property, use signal detectors, record photographic evidence, represent a police relationship and are looking for a legal guide. He adds that the unauthorized installation of cameras can justify the termination of the contract without a fine, according to the tenant’s law.

After initial attempts according to a friendly agreement, the parties came to an extrajudicial solution. However, the episode generated large repercussions and illuminated discussions on the legal limits of surveillance in rental properties in Brazil.

Source: Terra

You may also like