What was Pedro Pascal’s salary in ‘The last of us’ and why did it cause controversy?  we tell you

What was Pedro Pascal’s salary in ‘The last of us’ and why did it cause controversy? we tell you

“The last of Us” became one of the most popular video game adaptations, however, that did not exempt its protagonists from criticism or controversy.

When the casting was announced, many criticized the appearance of Bella Ramsey, who is genderqueer, because she doesn’t look identical to Ellie from the games. Now it’s Pedro Pascal, the Chilean actor who brought Joel to life, who is facing a peculiar controversy over the salary he was getting for taping the HBO Max series.

The pay gap in ‘The Last of Us’ that caused controversy

The first season of “The last of us” had nine episodes, and in each of which Pedro Pascal appeared, he earned $600,000, as reported by Variety in its article: “The ‘streaming boom’ keeps TV salaries at dizzying levels : Here’s What Kate Winslet, Jason Sudeikis and More Earn.”

In contrast, Bella Ramsey received a salary of $70,000 per episode, as reported on the Showbiz Galore portal. This would mean that Pascal had eight times the salary ($530,000 to be exact) compared to his co-star.

The reactions to the salary of Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsay in “The last of us

After the amounts went viral, several netizens reacted negatively to the pay disparity, deeming it unfair that the actors didn’t earn the same because their roles had equal importance and screen time:

“Pascal has to donate his surplus salary to keep up, would that make him a true progressive fighting for gender equality as he claims to be, or is he just saying it for fame?” said a Twitter user who went by the name ReTx.

On the other hand, there were those who stood in favor of Pedro Pascal, justifying his salary with the trajectory and popularity he has achieved in his 48 years of life. However, they were optimistic of a potential raise for the young actress following the success of the HBO Max series:

“Bella is just starting out, obviously she wouldn’t have a salary equal to, much less higher than, Pedro Pascal’s. If in season 2 they don’t raise Bella’s salary, it would be wrong and there would already be other biases in this decision,” wrote the Twitter user identified as Lups.

Similarly, other people believe that in terms of talent and resume, both Pascal and Ramsay are on par, so they blame the gender disparity in the entertainment industry for the difference in their pay:

“Bella Ramsey and Pedro Pascal started getting popular around the same time, so no, their salary has nothing to do with ‘Game of Thrones.’ It has more to do with her gender. Let’s agree that neither of them is a beauty or a terrible actress,” Dennis Tory said of the controversy.

Finally, one netizen commented that while Pascal’s salary is from a reliable source, Bella Ramsey’s salary is not (as even Showbiz Galore warns on its page to “verify [la información] after reading the articles” because they are based on Internet compilations without confirmed sources):

“Hi Marcos, I looked at the Variety article they are quoting, it has Pedro Pascal’s salary but not Bella Ramsay’s, which seems to be from ‘fake news’ with no corroborating source,” said netizen Jesus Sheikhas.

Although none of those involved have commented on the matter, there are those who believe that Bella Ramsey did indeed earn less than Pedro Pascal or else her name would appear on Variety’s list, but it is not known for sure how much or why she didn’t. appears.. What do you think?

Don’t leave without seeing:

loading gallery

Source: univision

You may also like