‘The Asunta Case’: What Really Happened to the Girl?  The most popular and accepted theories

‘The Asunta Case’: What Really Happened to the Girl? The most popular and accepted theories

The Netflix miniseries “The Asunta Case” has captured the attention of millions of viewers around the world, who have been immersed in the details of one of the most shocking and controversial crimes in Spain’s recent history.

The story focuses on the case of Asunta Basterra, a 12-year-old girl who was murdered by her own parents, Rosario Porto and Alfonso Basterra, in 2013. In all the episodes, the different elements surrounding this tragic event are presented, the parents of the minor were convicted to 18 years in prison after being found guilty according to the authorities, there are some theories about what really happened.

‘The Asunta case’: Netflix crime series theories

First, it is important to emphasize that in one of the episodes of the series, two theories are presented. The first is that Rosario was the one who drugged her daughter with lorazepam because she felt in an unhappy marriage and wanted to have time to herself, but it was her ex-husband who ultimately suffocated the girl.

The second is that Alfonso Basterra was the one who came up with the plan to kill Asunta, since his wife needed help to accomplish it, so the two worked together by drugging her months before with large amounts of lorazepam and when they killed her, the father left from the young man’s body on the street avoiding the security cameras.

Social Media Theories About ‘Asunta Case’ True Crime

However, with the premiere of the series, netizens also created their own theories, such as that Asunta Basterra accidentally died, which was reported by the Twitter user. @elfaargentino.

“A possible theory is that Asuda took the medicine every day, stealing it from her mother, one day she overdosed and died at home. Rosario found her, called Alfonso and asked for help. When they saw the pills, they covered the case by throwing away”.

The approach stood out as a new possibility for what happened, but did not explain how the girl ended up with signs of asphyxiation.

User @aventurembarazo He created a specific thread stating his theory, where he claims that Basterra was the culprit, because he was the only one “who had something to hide”.

According to his words, the journalist wanted to make Rosario appear as the author of the crime by telling the police and her own ex-partner that she killed her daughter when she was overcome by personality or because of her mental state. it just got out of hand.

“Besides the fact that he was the one who went to the pharmacy, he took great care not to obstruct or leave any traces, and the state of his ex-wife’s mental health was the perfect excuse for not the police, but herself to believe that ‘he was the material author”.

In the end he pointed out that Basterra probably showed unconditional support to his wife because he wanted to get her inheritance once she was found guilty, hence his secrecy in not confessing his involvement or blaming Rosario.

What do you think about this? Tell us in the comments.


Source: univision

You may also like