It’s not a bird and even less plane, it’s just one of the most expected blockbusters of this summer 2025. And for good reason: James Gun’s Superman is not only an iconic superhumor in the cinema, but also the way of a new DC Universe, directed by the producer of Peter Sapphire.
Thus, under the direction of the director of the galaxy guards, a steel man who is now portrayed by David Corrensvet will resume flight. In a film that interests a superman figure, its relevance and its importance in the current world (its own and ours), without the refusal of comic book nature. But what did viewers of this new version think?
By 5 to 3.37 from 380 notes, James Gunn’s Superman begins Richard, released in 1978 (3.56) and steel man by Zac Snider (3.57), who retains his title for the best solo film dedicated to a steel man. Of course, it can develop when the number of its viewers is increasing, but the feature precedes Batman V Superman and its 3.27.
During the James Gun’s superhero career, as a director, this Superman lags behind the three defenders of the galaxy at that moment (the corresponding means between 4.04 and 4.19), but only in front of the Suicide Squad (3.26), his first Foray Into DC Studios, giving him the architect of his new university.
What do the viewers of “Superman” think?
It was the most discussed aspect of the film, during its preliminary production and its shooting: casting. And it seems to please, because it is the most underlined quality when it comes to this new superman. “James Guni arrives here, supported by casting, which gives herself a heart to hand over all the features of comic books that many films like to be afraid to do so.”For example, to say Egnor (5 to 5) that supports John Smith (Same Note): “We can also welcome actors who are exceptional, especially David Korensvet in Superman, which is perfect both in the role and Nicolas Hult Who is amazingly in Lex Luthor. “
The same call sound Marnat (Ditto): “David Corresswight did a wonderful job as a superman, he completely realized the character when he added his touch, which gives the film charm as well as Rachel Brosnahan And Nicholas Hulty, as laws and lutter, who realized it. “ Although she played the hero, the antagonist’s translator sometimes greeted more than his partner/opponent, which is a small revenge for him: “Nicholas Hults play very well with Lex Luthor and his henches are very strong. Superman was required to taste maximum”Said so Cendyleon (Always the same note).
Another success of the viewer: the approach of the Superman’s character, more human and close to the original material from which he is inspired. “James Gunn signs an energetic tribute to the Golden Age Comics with a modern touch”Also written Ilian El Jemley (5 to 5). “The film is visually excellent, rhythmic and full of promising characters for the future of DCU. Clark Kent is more human and inspiring than ever. A true superhero film, in the most generous sense of the term.” “A real Superman’s film and a real movie by James Gun!”Inflammation Naughty doc (5 to 4). “This is the talent of the team that synthesizes everything we know about the archetypes of Superman, returning to their sauce and moving to a story, which is certainly simple (Lutor puts a plan to weaken and discredit Cally), but always depicts it.”
“A real superhero film, in the most generous sense of the term”
“James Gunnie perfectly understood what a superman should be, namely, to show it as a deeply human, despite God’s authority, a person who always prefers to do good than to destroy evil”Write Marvelman (From 5 to 4.5), which is one of the many spectators who welcome the director’s work. As Adrienne F. (4 to 4): “James Gun’s wonderful film, or how to update superman films with more realistic battles with more diverse abuse.” Or Whoungy (4 to 4): “This is a simple but effective, James team has appropriated the lightness of the superman world that you feel from the beginning and you are ready to fly with our beloved boy Scout.”
“The Superman Version Gunn is a solid, spectacular and well -embodied entertainment”Written by his side Gizmoka (From 5 to 3.5) that describes the result as “Unevenly”As well as Cinema (The same note) that welcomes the optimism whose film comes out of, “So much so that we are happy to get the character’s light, deeply human.”Sorry for a “Sometimes a balanced balance by writing uneven characters in secondary characters, Buruski’s true standard trains only cut off.”
And it makes a good transition to writing, regularly indicating for a variety of reasons: “James’s team must return to Marvel imperatically, his superman has no soul, aura and his script are completely crazy.”Said Rabbit (5 to 2.5). “The gap of horror with excessive and childish humor.” And it is not Spidergogo (The same note) that the opposite will say: “There are several topics, such as emigration, war, capitalism … but the film is so cursed and it goes so fast that it doesn’t really have the depth.”
“James Gun Superman is a bitter failure”
“Revised and Parody Superman” Regret Franzki 3375 (5 to 1.5), who is one of those who did not join humor. “A completely middle -level actors, especially for the roles of Superman and Lane’s laws, are really unpleasant about him. In addition, we can see that James’s team was trying to make an infantilized political indictment. “Superman must be considered a god who is inviolable”Adds Grégoire C. With the same note. “According to James Gunn, he sees him as Moron, the loser as the heroes he created.
“James Gun Superman is a bitter failure”Finally said Craft (50 to 0.5), which seems to be loved by nothing, nor casting. “Poorly played, poorly shot, it is deplorable, it has flaws with a chain with a regular (…) scenario lazy, with white wire sewn, fate we wait for ten minutes.
Briefly
The actor (David Corenswet, Rachel Brosnahan and Nicholas Hoult) appeals to the vast majority of viewers. More than a human approach and a loyal comic book, inspired by James Gun, or with the apparent love of the character. But the director’s color and fun style is more discussed (in particular in humor management), and the script, especially predictively and fuss, appears to be as one of the most recurring defects of the film, which is pleasing in total.
And you? What did you think about Superman?
* Notes stopped on Wednesday, July 9, 2025
Source: Allocine
Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.
