1950% of disaster and opportunities of 50%, “says Master in AI on technological reality

Nina da Hora spoke of the paradoxes of technology with Caio Vieira Machado and Daniela Lerario at the meeting of the living future, this Tuesday 26

Talking about technology means talking about paradoxes. And at the moment, the situation is divided into a 50% disaster and 50% opportunities. This is what the master has assessed in artificial intelligence and the technological researcher Nina da Hora during the in vivo in vivo meeting, which takes place this Tuesday 26, with live broadcast Earth. Daniela Lerario, environmentalist and specialist of the action for climate, Caio Vieira Machado, a lawyer specialized in the intersection between law and technology and mediation of Victor Cremasco, partner and CEO of Mandalah Brazil and conductor of Podcast from Future Vivo, also attended the panel.

• Receive the main news directly on WhatsApp! Sign up for the Earth channel

Nina, as computer science that discusses artificial intelligence, considers a disaster that most of the implementation of technologies in Brazil has been implemented in other countries for about 10 years. “What we have experienced in Brazil is the result of other countries, which most are in global North,” he explains.

But the fact that these technologies are in evidence does not mean that they are unique. He says there are a series of technologies that are not spoken and that, in the middle, it is necessary to use technology in a decolonial way. Unlike global North, in Latin America, knowledge is not built in a dispute of “Who is the best”, but from the enhancement of local knowledge, he says. And in this, there are many opportunities.

The researcher sees “backwards in transparency” and that today “there is no way to face pulverized information”:

As for artificial intelligence, for example, it says that the first chatbot was created over 35 years ago. Since then, much has changed and the IA has taken on a much larger space in people’s lives in the midst of unbridled technological progress and with little transparency. For Nina, this has generated risks such as the loss of the notion of time, the bombing of information and the impact on critical thinking.

It also shows the risk of prejudices – such as the genre and the racial ones – because the technologies in question are modeled by a look at the specific world and usually without making it evident. In this, there are those who outsource their decision -making process from technologies without even knowing what the rules are behind them, and it is here that violence usually occurs.

“The people who are developing [as novas tecnologias, como as IAs] They are mostly white men with an idea of ​​the world and society, most of the Silicon Valley, “he says, referring to the region in California, in the United States, known as Global Center for Technological Innovations.

Source: Terra

Rose

Rose James is a Gossipify movie and series reviewer known for her in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the latest releases. With a background in film studies, she provides engaging and informative reviews, and keeps readers up to date with industry trends and emerging talents.