Can the former CEO exposed on showing the Coldplay elaborating the band? See what Expert says

Can the former CEO exposed on showing the Coldplay elaborating the band? See what Expert says


Andy Byron resigned after the viralization of the video betrayal


Summary

Andy Byron, former Astronomer CEO, should not be able to process the Coldplay from the exhibition in a show due to the contractual assignment of the images during the acquisition of the ticket, although situations of crime of honor or embarrassment can generate legal actions.





The kiss camera captured the alleged betrayal during the Coldplay show in the United States:
  • Frequent

    Flagrae camera kiss supposed betrayal during the Coldplay show in the United States

    Flagrae camera kiss supposed betrayal during the Coldplay show in the United States

  • Frequent

    Maraisa Fidelis and Luca Pucci give suggestions for those who want to start creating content

    Maraisa Fidelis and Luca Pucci give suggestions for those who want to start creating content

  • Frequent

    Maraisa Fidelis and Luca Pucci exhibit the main challenges of the content creation market

    Maraisa Fidelis and Luca Pucci exhibit the main challenges of the content creation market

  • Frequent

    Script, teams, publishers and more: backstage behind the creation of content

    Script, teams, publishers and more: backstage behind the creation of content

Following the repercussion of the video of a former CEO who betrays his wife with the director of human resources of the company during the Coldplay show in Boston (United States), virals on social networks, speculation has begun if the manager can sue the British band for the exhibition.

The director of Andy Byron and the human resources Kristin Cabot were captured in the vein of love during the presentation of the band on 16 July. Known for its romantic repertoire, the Coldplay has a Kiss Cam (Kiss Camera), which films the audience in times of affection and display on the big screen.

According to the lawyer Fernanda Zuffe, in this case, the right to the image can be related because it is an event open to the public. “In the case of the United States, by acquiring the entrance, the viewer generally generates the use of the image through the so clear” entrance terms “, standard contractual clauses that usually go unnoticed”, explains to Earth.

“In this sense, the tickets sold usually include terms that authorize the acquisition and use of images, both for recordings and screens of events. Furthermore, there was only a momentary view on the public show screen, without use in merchandising or advertising. Therefore, it does not constitute a violation of the image or improper use under Massachusetts”, he adds.

The expert underlined, however, that even with the rules in force in the United States, it is still possible responsible when the exposure translates into an offense to honor, embarrassment, damage to the image or causing suffering relevant to the person involved.

“The cause can last years, in addition to consuming money with costs and legal expenses, there is also the risk of having a sentence contrary to initial requests and providing convictions in succession taxes,” he says.

On the other hand, Cabot still maintains his work as director of Astronomer’s human resources. Second The New York PostAlthough it is the license from his duties, the dismissal should still occur. Sources consulted by the publication reported following its position for legal reasons.

“Apparently, there is no evidence of sexual harassment in the present case, since it proves to be a relationship agreed to both sides. But if Kristin Cabot has elements that can demonstrate a possible harassment, he could sue Andy Byron”, says the lawyer.

As for a possible dismissal of Cabot, in the event of evidence on the eventual penalty of the employee for the accident, it is possible to intent on due to the abuse of power perpetrated by the company.

“Although companies have the freedom to establish rules of internal relationship, in light of the Brazilian Constitution, there is an impediment regarding interference in the private life of employees,” he concludes.

Source: Terra

You may also like