Quentin Tarantino, the right time to quit
The 76th Cannes Film Festival was marked by the arrival of Quentin Tarantino. Unfortunately not to present his latest film, but that of John Flynn, Thunder rumble dating back to 1977. The fortnight of directors given carte blanche to Tarantino, the director wanted to share one of his favorite films with the public. And after the screening, of course, the director stayed for a while to discuss different topics.
While a lot of mystery hangs over his next film The film critic, which will normally be the last of his career, Quentin Tarantino did not provide further details on this matter. Except that the film will follow a film critic in Hollywood in 1977, everything is still very vague.
Present at the Cannes Film Festival, Expiration had the opportunity to ask him about his future retirement. The opportunity for Tarantino to specify that after him he should no longer make a film, but that he could very well do it a seriesa short film or game, though write that seems to be what interests him the most now.
It’s just time. It’s time to stop. I like the idea of letting be on top. The idea of giving it your all for 30 years and then saying, okay, that’s enough. I wouldn’t go back to do something less important.
Ryan Reynolds Netflix movies don’t exist
Quentin Tarantino goes on to evoke the justification for his imminent retirement the future of cinema. Quite pessimistic, so gets straight to the point streaming platforms.
What does it mean today to make a film for the cinema? Is this just something that will be released at Apple? This is an element that could make any return disappointing.
His goal would then be to go back to work with Sony (After Once upon a time… in Hollywood) to ensure a theatrical release. A study for which he is full of praise.
They are the last ones in this sector who are totally dedicated to the cinematic experience. They’re not trying to cram their streaming service. They judge success by the number of donkeys in a chair. And they judge the success of a film by how it will mark the history of cinema, not just by the pleasure of making expensive films which they will then offer in streaming. Where no one knows they exist.
Quentin Tarantino then gets to give a specific example by pointing Ryan Reynolds latest movies on Netflix, Red alert AND Adam through time. According to him, the interpreter of Deadpool would be paid every time $50 million for movies he hasn’t seen e Who “does not exist“.
I don’t mean to hurt anyone, but apparently with Netflix, Ryan Reynolds made $50 million on one movie, $50 million on another movie, and $50 million on the next one. I don’t know what these movies are. I’ve never seen them. And she ? I never spoke to Ryan Reynolds’ agent, but he said, “It cost $50 million.” Good for him if he earns so much money. But these films do not exist in the history of cinema. It’s almost as if they don’t exist at all.
Source: Cine Serie
Ray Ortiz is a journalist at Gossipify, known for his coverage of trending news and current events. He is committed to providing readers with accurate and unbiased reporting, and is respected for his ability to keep readers informed on the latest news and issues.
-1iv9d9fl4wd46.png "Sus will be offered the contraceptive system up to R $ 4,000; understand")
