What not to do: the most common errors when setting the study program

What not to do: the most common errors when setting the study program





With the arrival of the second half, many people decide to reorganize their studies to obtain better results by the end of the year. For Michel Arthaud, Professor to Professor Ferretto’s platform, planning the study routine is a task that goes far beyond filling the tables with times. A poorly structured program can generate frustration, anxiety and feeling of stagnation, even with effort.
“Good planning is not the best, it is the most intelligent. The biggest mistakes are generally related to the lack of self -knowledge and the idea that studying the more is always better,” says Michel. With this in mind, he listed five common mistakes that hinder the journey of those who want to enjoy the second half of the semester with greater attention, efficiency and balance:

1. To underestimate the importance of reviews

One of the most recurring wrong ideas is to give priority to the study of new content and set aside the review. This compromises long -term conservation and increases the risk of forgetting important problems at the time of the test.
How to correct: “Create weekly review cycles. Use mental maps, flashcards or redo the previous tests. The review is as important as learning”, explains Arthaud.

2. Ignores breaks and moments of rest

Many students believe that the study relentlessly is a sign of commitment, but the effect can be the opposite: mental fatigue, drop in concentration and demotivation.
How to correct: “Establishing regular intervals between the blocks of study. The tomato technique (25 minutes of focus, 5 pause) is a simple and effective option. Rest does not delay. It recovers the energy and improves the absorption of the content”, underlines the teacher.

3. Create inflexible programs

Rigid planning, which does not consider unexpected or difficulty with certain issues, usually do not work in the long term. How to correct: “Set a program adaptable, with margins to reorganize content. It is important to have objectives, but they must be realistic and adjustable. The study is marathon, not 100 meters of running”, compares Michel.

4. Repeat stories in sequence without alternation

Studying several hours in a row The same discipline can lead to cognitive saturation. How to correct: “Alternative areas of knowledge during the day, for example, mathematical intercal with history or biology with literature. This stimulates the different regions of the brain and maintains the focus on focus”, says Arthaud.

5. Study without a defined strategy

Studying “automatically” or simply following the order of textbooks can be ineffective, especially in a limited program. How to correct: “Give the priority to the most loaded topics in the tests, use video lessons to review complex topics and follow your progress with weekly goals”, concludes the teacher.

6. Simulations made and correct

Michel stresses that simulated correction is the most important part in this final trait. “Here’s how you observe and learn from your mistakes,” he says. More than simply hitting questions, the goal of the simulated is to identify the weak points, review the scarcely understood content and regulate the strategy for the official test.
How to correct: make sure that the correction of all the tests made.

AND

This is time to understand where you made a mistake and why. The student can transform each brief into an opportunity for learning, acquiring more security and trust for the admission exam.

Source: Terra

You may also like