As a true cinephile, Quentin Tarantino loves nothing more than dissecting the works of filmmakers. Among them, Stanley Kubrick, whom he moderately appreciates, in particular, one of his works, which became the subject of a new adaptation in 1997.
If there’s one thing Tarantino adores, it’s his willingness to single out the works of the directors who largely fueled his cinephilia, whether it’s the absolute classics of 7th Art or the works of Cinema Bis, though even Z. has a harder time. with the formalism of a filmmaker like Stanley Kubrick, and explained this in an extensive interview published in The New Yorker in 2003.
In fact, he finds Kubrick’s work too cold, too contrived, too lacking in humanism. A reproach that was often leveled at the master who died in 1999. If he appreciates his films, he has no influence on them. “The first twenty minutes of A Clockwork Orange are absolutely perfect” loose QT before denouncing Kubrick’s hypocrisy about his will “Make a film not about violence, but about condemning violence.”
scanning his filmography, He admits that he prefers Lolita, Adrian Lyne’s (a big box office flop) and the 1997 version to Kubrick’s 1962 version. “I think Lolita by Adrian Lyne is a masterpiece. When I saw it, I wondered if Kubrick had read the book. He took the book and turned it into this crazy comedy, which is pretty amazing.”
and adds: “But the idea that you can make a Lolita movie without one disturbing image is crazy. It’s a scam! I mean, it’s missing the most fascinating part of the job, which is to look through the eyes of a pedophile and accept it.”
Source: allocine
Emily Jhon is a product and service reviewer at Gossipify, known for her honest evaluations and thorough analysis. With a background in marketing and consumer research, she offers valuable insights to readers. She has been writing for Gossipify for several years and has a degree in Marketing and Consumer Research from the University of Oxford.
