Edna Santos was fired earlier this month on charges of illegally hosting one of the artist’s homes, stealing drinks, among other things.
Summary
A former employee of Caetano Veloso has filed two labor lawsuits in the Rio de Janeiro court, after being fired, seeking compensation of R$2.6 million.
One Caetano Veloso’s former employee and his wife, Paula Lavigne, have filed two lawsuits at the Court of Rio de Janeiro, after being fired for just cause. In short, the former employee asks compensation of R$ 2.6 millione.g. The information comes from VejaSP.
Receive the main news directly on WhatsApp! Subscribe to the Terra channel
Edna Paula da Fonseca Santos he was fired at the beginning of the month on charges of stealing bottles of alcoholic beverages, staying clandestinely in a house in Bahia and using a vehicle of the musician’s company for private purposes. The woman worked for Caetano’s family for 22 years.
According to the publication, Edna denies the accusations and states that Caetano and Paola they have to prove what they say. “The defendants must pay compensation Edna for violations of his personality rights, such as honour, privacy and image, an issue which will be addressed in a separate proceeding,” reads an excerpt from the trial.
The former employee still charges workers’ compensation, work accumulation, overtime, salary incorporation, among other expenses, totaling 2.6 million. She received a monthly salary of R$4,800, however R$2,000 was paid “outside”.
In another action, Edna he claims to have lived, with his two children, since 2017, in the couple’s apartment in Ipanema, free of charge. After your dismissal, you received a notice to vacate the property within 30 days.
Paula, however, would have requested that an architect come to the structure to analyze the location. Here because, Edna asked the court to reject the request. Judge Livia dos Santos Vardiero Crespo, of the 28th Labor Court of Rio de Janeiro, granted an injunction in response to the request for Edna on May 9th.
“I order the defendants to refrain, for a period of 30 (thirty) days, starting from the plaintiff’s dismissal, from making new attempts to enter the plaintiff’s home, personally or through agents, and, within the same period, from refrain from requesting that the perpetrator leave the property,” reads an excerpt of the injunction.
Source: Terra
Earl Johnson is a music writer at Gossipify, known for his in-depth analysis and unique perspective on the industry. A graduate of USC with a degree in Music, he brings years of experience and passion to his writing. He covers the latest releases and trends, always on the lookout for the next big thing in music.
